The math makes sense, you would say 50 watts but unfortunately the program is only able to claim and incentive ieds that smaller amount because that is the amount thats above the states title 24 code base line. This is something that weve been able to break through with the barren program and something we hope to do with other programs. The bay run has given us this interesting proof of concept. The success has been remarkable. In 18 months of bay run we have served 9500 residential units. Its built on our expertise with programs. Bay run is flexible, comp prehence and accessible. Weve expanded on this longterm model of energy watch but we want to do more for all our customers moving forward. We think that cca gives us the opportunity to do that. We want to more completely account for and incentivize project savings. We know that we might not start right away with the ccas Energy Efficiency program, but we cant help but think about what the next generation of Energy Efficiency program
Management time and our marketing dollars by limiting the amount of marketing we need to do and on site visits. They avoid stranding the inaudible increasing energy costs and putting our businesses at risk every day we hear this on all of our site visits. We also would like to see continued job creation in the manufacturing, sale and installation of Energy Efficient technology. We have the vision. The next step is to work with our partners like the puc to determine a timeline. We have a powerful future here. We believe cca will help San Francisco bridge our Current Energy efficiency work and the promise of clean renewable future. We will continue to lead not only with our innovative ideas but also innovative methods of implementation. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you for your presentation. We have questions from the committee. Supervisor mar. Can i just i would love to just bookend this with some final thoughts, would it be okay . Please. I want to thank you, kathleen, that wa
Little bit of that luxury of time to plan so that when we know the amount of money thats well have a menu of things we can do and depending on how much funding the cpuc allocates to the cca, theres a little bit of argument, as you can imagine, between pg e and ccas between who gets the public good charge money and how much and that hasnt been settled yet. Thats why barbara hale and i have a hard time planning our budgets for additional resources. We know what we have now and as kathleen said were fully expected to keep going where we are now, but that additionality is tough and its tough no know how much and when. Whether its legislative or not, the voice of this body needs to be heard at the California Public Utilities Commission. I mean if you look at whats going on internationally now, theres tremendous understanding that Green House Gas production emissions happen at the city level and we are fully equiped to make those happen if we have the freedom to do it right and thats the mes
Market rate luxury housing in San Francisco. Im not sure, the majority of these buildings are they going up with systems that are actually noncarbon, are they actually maximizing efficiency, are we seeing solar on these buildings . And if not i think its worthy of putting some requirements on especially the market rate luxury housing that the exploding the city to be able to put these requirements on them and i think the department of the environment weighing in on that would be really helpful. We are definitely excited about the opportunities for heat pumps replacing combustion heating for water heating and space heating. There are real and solar water heating, of course. Unfortunately for tall high rise buildings once you get over about 10 stories, the possibility of being able to have much solar access on the roof is extremely diminished because they have a lot of needs for ventilation and other things through that roof top, so theres a lot of competing needs plus the size and the d
Timeline . So they are currently evaluating at the cpuc having a rolling timeline and not a set timeline. Oh, good. Okay. Were hoping that with our by filing an application during this year well be able to be rolled in to that rolling process. And youre right, historically they did have like a 3 year set time frame where there was a window you would get in and then youd have to wait. And because, from our perspective, and the wonderful thing about bay run, as you know, commissioner mar, is that its a proof of concept. In a way its a pilot of what the kind of comprehensive programs can be. Right now bay run is a very small amount of money. Energy watch is about 7 million to bay runs 450, 350,000. So its a very small window of whats possible but because weve already done it as soon as theres sort of that mental sufficient evidence of launch, you know, where we are very confident this is going to be real, then were going to start planning. As you know for any program to launch theres a to