and we don t believe her by the way. so that s one potential area of inquiry in connection with these raids. but it s possible the bank didn t ask. and maybe the line of credit, maybe it was before that. it s possible. second area of inquiry is, we know that he set up a single purpose llc, and that he then established one or more bank accounts for that llc. in connection with that, we would have had to tell the bank what that company was about, what his business purpose was, how much money was going to flow in and out of those accounts. the bank would have asked these questions. again, i don t believe he was honest with the bank. that may also prove to be an area of liability. number three, we know that after the $130,000 payment to my client was wired out of one of those accounts that he set up for the llc, we know that at some point later the bank conducted an internal investigation into that payment. our understanding is that the bank inquired of michael cohen as to the purpose
questions. again, i don t believe he was honest with the bank. that may also prove to be an area of liability. number three, we know that after the $130,000 payment to my client was wired out of one of those accounts that he set up for the llc, we know that at some point later the bank conducted an internal investigation into that payment. our understanding is that the bank inquired of michael cohen as to the purpose of that payment and he was not truthful with them. let me ask you this, how does this connect back to the president, if at all? well, depending on what the president knew and when he knew it, especially in relation to this 130$130,000 payment, it co spill over to the president, depending on michael cohen and the liability he faces, he may turn state s evidence on the president and come clean about what the president knew. and that could be a very, very bad thing for the president. michael avenatti, thank you very much. when we come back, it would be suicide, that s
timing, all right, that s all speculative and guesswork. but it has nothing to do it s correlative. it may not be causation. you hit t there s no causation. i m saying that s the issue. i m not saying there s no causation. that would be a dangerous precedent because every person running for congress why because any business transaction that s done could be considered a campaign contribution. do you realize how dangerous that is it would have to involve the principal of the candidate in this case and done in a way that seems to motivate the campaign during that time. when he created the llc. i know he says he didn t for this purpose. but whatever. when he created the llc. why did he do this when? because this is when it all went down. to create an llc avenatti says cohen went to here. he haavenatti makes no sense.
llcs are created every single day for see owes, lawyers, doctors, politicians to enter into ndos to avoid litigation and save the embarrassment for their family. who approached stormy daniels was shopping the best deal she could shop. some call it hush money. i call it legal extortion. when you have a situation from 12 years ago and all of a sudden you want to collect as much money as possible, that s called motivations aside, are you saying the way this borkd, the timing matters. that cohen didn t close to the election date seek out stormy daniels and say let s quiet this up right now? she admitted on 60 minutes, she was shopping the best deal possible and then her lawyer called it, she said it on 60 minute minutes . her lawyer called her and said this is the best deal. they were shopping it to all kinds of places. you re saying her lawyer shopped it to cohen?
shows up with her daughter in the back of the court. there s only one logical place that sent the goon. it s common sense. i don t have evidence that the sun is going to rise tomorrow, but i think it s fairly common sense that it s going to. i want to bring in a defense attorney. carolyn, thank you for coming in. what s important about this case that people need to know about and what is not? as much as i enjoy the audrey details about what may have or may not have happened, that s not really at the heart of this case. it s doubling down, putting more pressure on cohen. he amended the complaint to add cohen in his personal capacity as opposed to the professional capacity of the llc. this story is not going away. i think a brilliant move was a