Tour visits chico, california. For six years, we have traveled to u. S. Cities, bringing the our viewers. You can learn more online. Media smack down, deconstructing the news and media journalism. Reporter of the Indianapolis Star for 25 years. He is a prolific author in retirement. He put together the manuscript and brought me toward the end of things to bring a different perspective to the work. The book gives this brush over of the history of journalism. There is a nice chapter on that. The basic idea is you have these series of factors that transform journalism in the last 75 years. We had the rise of corporate ownership starting in 1946. We had the rise of the internet. We had the rise of the world wide web, which changed almost everything and allowed individuals to participate. Economicad global collapse starting about 2007. Along with that, we had the rise and socialnes, apps, media. You have this corporate storm, declining returns because of competition and economic issues, res
Facebook, Google Twitter needs a free press. They need a democracy and journalism will sub five because they need journalism to survive. We caught up with darren hurley. A couple of case studies of the movement of the youth through the determinant sentencing process and then we also look at what are the what kind of institutional misconduct did the kid engage in. Who engage friday more misconduct within the facility. One Main Research question. We look at what are the factors that determine whether youth is released into the Community Without supervision ration leased with supervision or tran federal to the adult side. So we understand the decisionmaking. And then we look the ultimate recidivism question. A fiveyear followup time, given what maybe how much misconduct they were involved in the background risk factors and which predict how they behave when the get out and how many of these youth are committing new crimes. If the sentences scheme is supposed improve upon other rates resid
The book is the brainchild of a commodore, he was a reporter for the indianapolis hartford 25 years, hes a prolific author in retirement and aid had continued the manuscript and brought in jim kuyper and me toward the end of things to bring adifferent perspective. But the book is kind of the brush of the history of journalism, theres a nice chapter on the history of journalism but the basic idea is you have these factors that transformed journalism in the past 65 years so we had the rise of corporate ownership in about 1946, we had the rise of the internet, we had the rise of the world wide web. That takes almost everything and allowed individuals to participate and then we had Global Economic collapse during 2007 and along with that we had our smart phone apps and social media. Youve got the perfect storm where you havecorporate ownership of the media , declining returns because of competition and economic issues. And you have a result, a flood of information and bad Economic Times wh
And then we look at the ultimate recidivism question, a fiveyear followup time of given what may be misconduct, background risk factors, individual characteristics, which of those most strongly predicts how they behave when they get out and how many of these are committing new crimes. It are sensing scheme is supposed to move onto other rates of recidivism as high as 87 , commit an offense can oftentimes a felony. Does this sentencing scheme thats been a place and no one has evaluated for over three decades, is it working . Based on how the kids behave when they get out. Historically, through the 70s, 60s and 70s texas mirrored the National Landscape of juvenile justice. The original foundation of the juvenile justice is rehabilitated in nature. The state means the juvenile system is meant to take care of in the youth that may wander away from the straight and narrow, right . Become involved in criminal behavior, involved in the system. And so texas mirrored approaches to provide rehab
Dragging fun club because the Public Perception is that is what we are. And if i can stress one thing, and i saw mr. Samuels trying to stress it, and i would also. At one time early in my Law Enforcement career i may have had that same impression, but i have to tell you that overall i have never seen a more dedicated professional group of men and women at risk their lives and do it because they want to have a Safer Community and put themselves at great risk to do that. That aside, like any large bureaucracy envy tend to be the largest in any state or close to it, you end up with problems. It is how we react to those problems. That is why right now when i really appreciate what he have done by calling this hearing in miami participate because i can tell you that i dont know of any state in the nation that is not taking a hard look at their administrative segregation policy. You have really brought to the forefront. We all understand that as professionals the movement is this is not the