Of crimes for which people are held, which is we have the population lets see, we were going to build a jail for 380 and we look at the jail population today with all of the work around bail reform and the psas and we have a population of about 313 based on this one date that the bla gave us and i look at these. I look at the crimes upon which people are being held and we know that we have the psa and i see crimes like murder. 30 people held for that, attempted murder, firstdegree robbery, assault with a deadly weapon, kidnapping to commit another crime, assault with a semiautomatic firearm, sexual intercourse or sotoomy with a child 10 years old or younger, kidnapping by use of drugs. Weve developed a whole entire office to deal with rape that victims in this town are not treated well when it comes to whether or not their prosecutions will go forward, not just by use of drugs. I look at these, mayhem, torture, these are crimes that nobody wants to happen no any of their loved ones. An
Supervisor furer. Yes, thank you very much. And i want to thank my colleagues, and supervisor stephanie for her comment. I want to push back a bill lit anlittle bit and i say this as a wife of a husband who worked as a San Francisco Police Officer for 35 years. My husband has worked in, i think, pretty dicey units, undercover, narcotic, he was a specialist, on a specialist team, a training office, a whole variety. And so, i want to just say that we can look back at 2015, but none of us sitting her here in. I think the conversations that happened then extend to what were discussing now. I understand were looking at a jail number and that does not tell the whole picture of our jail system. I think to really evaluate our opportunities, to lower the rate of people incarcerated, we cant look at jail number four. This is not true of jail number five or jail number two. We havent seen those numbers yet. This report is a narrow scope. We talk about jail number four, it is inadequate and doing
We know theyre and essential component of our Justice System and we need to Work Together with them. The capital priorization is not yet final. The latest date i heard from the Judicial Council is midnovember, november 14th and 15th, hoping to finalize the list and we can, i hope, hear answers back about our positions about that list and the deadline in the legislation is the end of the year and thats when the court responds back to the legislature and gets the ball rolling with the department of works and public finance. All of our reconsolidated will be in partnership with the courts to operate uninterrupted and none of this would pose a slowdown in du due process. Thats what i have for you about our admin. Happy to answer any questions that i can. I have a few. Thank you for this presentation. One, and in has been a challenge with understanding fully whose responsibility when it comes to cj4 and seems the city administrator has taken the responsibility to clearly articulate what wil
Colleagues, and supervisor stephanie for her comment. I want to push back a bill lit anlittle bit and i say this as a wife of a husband who worked as a San Francisco Police Officer for 35 years. My husband has worked in, i think, pretty dicey units, undercover, narcotic, he was a specialist, on a specialist team, a training office, a whole variety. And so, i want to just say that we can look back at 2015, but none of us sitting her here in. I think the conversations that happened then extend to what were discussing now. I understand were looking at a jail number and that does not tell the whole picture of our jail system. I think to really evaluate our opportunities, to lower the rate of people incarcerated, we cant look at jail number four. This is not true of jail number five or jail number two. We havent seen those numbers yet. This report is a narrow scope. We talk about jail number four, it is inadequate and doing a disservice on the board of supervisors because we have to look at