that supports what lee said. there needs to be more oversight and more accountability. mr. chairman, my time is expired. these points are very clear to all of us today in this hearing room. i yelled back. i now recognize mr. garcia he left. i now recognize miss green from georgia for 5 minutes of questions. thank you, mr. chairman. mr. fauci, you were quoted saying, it is easy to criticize, but they are really criticizing science, because i represent science. do you represent science, mr. fauci? i am a scientist that uses the scientific method to gain information. you said you represent science. do you represent science, yes or no? that s not a y a yes or it s a yes or no. we will take that is you don t know what you represent. this is director of the nih, you did sign off on these so-called scientific experiments. i want to tell you, this is disgusting. and evil. what you signed off on in these experiments that happened to beagles, paid for by the a
i want them now. hannity and tonight album brags while crowning t political show trial is almost over. the closing arguments are in the bookris arguments, and soon 12 jurors selected from one of the most anti trump districts in theanti entire country. they will decide the fate of donaltr d trump pending appeal. now, today, the prosecution asked jurors to throw caution to the wind, convict the former president of a crimer that they were never able to explain, let alone prove it. le tn in fact, bragg wants the y to hand down 34 felony convictionyut 3s. based on what we have been h saying from the beginning. the l theory surroundingding a a misdemeanor document labeling allegation well past l the statute of limitationsab upcharge to a felony because of this mysterious election lawr violation that was never charged or prosecuteio d evere in a anywhere in america. and this entire convolutedme ca relies on one witness, a convicted liarconvic, admitted liar, disbarred lawyer by th
sean: welcome to hannity as the political show trial is almost over closing arguments in the books and soon 12 jurors selected from 1 of the most anti- trumped districts in the entire country will decide the fate of donald trump pending appeal. today the prosecution asked a jurors differ caution to the wind and convict the former president of a crime they were never able to explain let alone prove in fact he wants the jury to handout 34 felony convictions based on what we have said from the beginning and novel legal theories surrounding a misdemeanor document labeling allegation well past statute of limitations of charge to a felony because of a mysterious election law violation never charged or prosecuted every anywhere else in america the convoluted case relies on a convicted liar admitted liar, a disbarred lawyer named michael cohen. we have talked in detail about the altar your motives of the judge and the lack of credibility from cohen and about a judge you should ha
regarding the grant termination. does that violate policy? it was inappropriate for him to go doing that for a grantee as a conflict of interest, among other things. on march 29, 2021, dr. morens edited a letter that dr. das yak was sending to nih. does that violate policy? yes. he provided him with advice regarding how to mislead nih on eco health s late progress report. does that violate policy? it was wrong and inappropriate and violated policy. on december 7th, 2021, dr. morens wrote to the chair of eco health s board of directors to quote put in a word, end quote, for the doctor. does that violate policy? should not have done that. that was wrong. it violates policy. i m not sure of a specific policy. i imagine it does. he should not have been doing that. in addition to all those actions dr. morens wrote to the doctor peter from tony s recent comments to me they are trying to protect you, end quote. did you ever talk to dr. morens about dr. daczak and e