that supports what lee said. there needs to be more oversight and more accountability. mr. chairman, my time is expired. these points are very clear to all of us today in this hearing room. i yelled back. i now recognize mr. garcia he left. i now recognize miss green from georgia for 5 minutes of questions. thank you, mr. chairman. mr. fauci, you were quoted saying, it is easy to criticize, but they are really criticizing science, because i represent science. do you represent science, mr. fauci? i am a scientist that uses the scientific method to gain information. you said you represent science. do you represent science, yes or no? that s not a y a yes or it s a yes or no. we will take that is you don t know what you represent. this is director of the nih, you did sign off on these so-called scientific experiments. i want to tell you, this is disgusting. and evil. what you signed off on in these experiments that happened to beagles, paid for by the a
regarding the grant termination. does that violate policy? it was inappropriate for him to go doing that for a grantee as a conflict of interest, among other things. on march 29, 2021, dr. morens edited a letter that dr. das yak was sending to nih. does that violate policy? yes. he provided him with advice regarding how to mislead nih on eco health s late progress report. does that violate policy? it was wrong and inappropriate and violated policy. on december 7th, 2021, dr. morens wrote to the chair of eco health s board of directors to quote put in a word, end quote, for the doctor. does that violate policy? should not have done that. that was wrong. it violates policy. i m not sure of a specific policy. i imagine it does. he should not have been doing that. in addition to all those actions dr. morens wrote to the doctor peter from tony s recent comments to me they are trying to protect you, end quote. did you ever talk to dr. morens about dr. daczak and e
i think you put an exclamation point on how important these a are. dr. kyle trego would you agree that this demonstrates the need for more accountability and increase oversight? what you saw i believe was an outlier. the individuals at the nih and naiad are a very committed group of individuals. this one instance that you point out isn t an outlier. from your senior advisor for 20 years. on the is senior advisor. we wrote scientific papers together. he didn t advise me as i mentioned. are your senior advisors not trusted staff? again, i told you that his title as senior advisor. but he is not an advisor on policy. that is very confusing to have someone s title and not have that to be there obligation. that is the fact.