been the point person for donald trump on documents he had taken from the white house, that person, evan corcoran has become a major witness in this case, clearly his part of the obstruction of justice part of this set of charges. so now we are aware that donald trump and his legal team, they re scrambling to try and find people. they re talking out, they re reaching out to lawyers in florida. i ve heard a couple of different names. it s still not totally clear who all is going to show up in court today to represent the former president. one of those people is a man named todd blanch. he was very successful representing paul manafort in 2016 in a case in new york state. blanch has sort of taken on much of the responsibility on this legal team recently, but all of this switchover of lawyers, it doesn t usually happen at this moment in this way. and it really is something that could slow down the case going forward. yeah, it s interesting. we ll have to watch how this
more embarrassing materials from emerging or prevent some of their biggest names from testifying in court? and do we think there s any precedent or warnings that could shape coverage going forward for fox but also media at large? as far as precedent, jonathan, this is not a case that went to a verdict there s no appellate decision here, just a settlement. so fox news has been warned now. they had to pay out a huge settlement, but i think they think of this as a victory because the last thing they wanted to do was go on the air every hour and admit the election was legit and the reason why and this is the reason why they didn t settle yet until just now is because i think they re scared of their viewers they didn t want their viewers to switchover to the more right-wing stations, believe it or not, to get the information that they believe in they didn t want to tell their viewers the truth. this like dr. frankenstein who became scared of the monster that he created.
according to the fbi, you can see it on the screen, they have only collected data from 65% of law enforcement agency, meaning we don t know how many hate crimes happened in 2021, that is partly because of a switchover to a new database reporting system that many agencies, at least some of them, have not fully caught up to yet. i want to bring our guest to talk more about it. we talked about how the fbi now has an incomplete assessment of hate crimes around the country, but i know that they are monitoring the situation, and there is cause for concern in all 50 states, attacks against lbgtq events for example, and concerned not only legislatively in congress, but at the state level, too. what else can be done? what do you want to see happen here moving forward? a lot needs to be done. and i think one of the things that you mentioned is that we have seen an increase, we ve seen over 150 attacks or threats
read that style that they wrote the headlines in. i wouldn t have done that. and the pitch. i am a soccer guy but don t be a soccer guy. i m a soccer guy and you are not, don t be a soccer guy. it s not - it is 20. i don t know who wrote it. it is a field, not a pitch. rachel: what are you doing? will: i don t know much more than pete but there is a bar close by at the end of the show because the game is as our show ends starting at 10:00 eastern and we end on fox. stay with us to the very end and switchover. will: do you see the seinfeld clip, what is holland? what is the country next to belgium, no, that is the netherlands, they are the same. who are the dutch? pete: i need a clarification on those names, one country, three names. is it like england and the
they were part of a big experiment, that they had no say in, and they were faced with the situation of having to trust that things are not. when you say, get the regulations right, what does that mean exactly? over the next year, the government has promised to legislate around this technology, which means things like clarifying legal responsibilities in the event of a switchover between computer and human control. it means things like coming up with rules on transparency, coming up with rules on privacy, so that these things, which are covered in cameras, there are some rules about who has access to all of that camera footage, as there is a danger of surveillance on wheels, that people are they may be looked at wherever they go. driverless cars, are the exciting, there are the terrifying? or are