Always about this done it says we should look at it as we go forward i suggest this is amended to the subcommittee or to the full board. My it seems like theres convenes to omit. Yeah. Omit. That sounds fine to me otherwise i think Everything Else is fine and leaving the noticing is k34r5ik9d question we should look at it in the future but it seems like we should stay with what has been done in the past wear not voting. On the submittal hearing guidelines. Were submitting to the rules and regulations as well and just for clarity the director performance evaluation didnt have to be wrapped into the rules themselves but is a practice to the commission to simply initiate that closed session. Could the City Attorney weigh in on that. Deputy City Attorney Susan Cleveland knolls i agree that the directors performance evaluation can be a completely separate matter. How said it not specifically. It doesnt mean you dont do it but include it in the rules and regulations of the commission itself.
Last week only turk street it was less expensive and over here the money shot the income so what im hearing the rents on Group Housing are higher than market rate luxury housing theyre more affordable affordable means someone that makes hundred thousand dollars a year can pay for o more versus the rates are five or 6 a unit it was mentioned in the presentation where is comes together the yields it is generated by the market rate housing what the market will bear the whole notion were increasing the costs what the market bears that is bearing a lot more per foots on the smaller rather than the larger i wish i should someone from the market rate community here i wish mr. Coleman were here this is like any other housing costs are the same if youre making more you should be giving Something Back the 12 percent inclusionary clapping. excuse me. A thats not necessary and the 12 percent inclusionary is not onerous to be honest and no developer has told me im wrong, and, secondly, on the men,
Environmental review this is a bar that project has to be reviewed. Deputy City Attorney mirena burns so i think you framed it this way youre asking two separate questions what the standard for performing Environmental Review on a project when you have approved that are much later than the eir was done thats one question and the authority the commission has in reviewing this project given the approval happened almost 14 years ago im happy to speak to both questions i dont know the specifics of this questions or is Environmental Impact report but it is required later a determination by sarah jones as the Environmental Review officer as changes in circumstances or changes to the project or potentially mitigation measures alternative to the project depending on the initial eir eir ladies leads to new impacts my trigger an Environmental Review as far as the commissions authority until they receive their final Building Permit the project sponsors does not have a right to a permit they expir
The architects work id like to encourage the commission and the department to ask them to relook at this design thank you. Is there any additional Public Comment . Sue hester my address is 8 sfgov Market Street the entrance it across the street from this hotel in the middle i looked at all the pictures they havent been taken in the past two years because ellis street is blocked off the big thing happening on stockton street the street pattern is changed because of the central subway the eir that was done talked about circulation that existed in 2000 this is 2015 heading to 2016 im scratching my head and saying what information does the Planning Department operate on which is dramatically different in 2015 into the 2016 from what you evaluated this is different from the design issues you may have issues as commissioners but i know this site every time i go to any office i go by it i dont use the Market Street entrance such as the ellis street and right now i really it has a traffic patt
The authority the commission has in reviewing this project given the approval happened almost 14 years ago im happy to speak to both questions i dont know the specifics of this questions or is Environmental Impact report but it is required later a determination by sarah jones as the Environmental Review officer as changes in circumstances or changes to the project or potentially mitigation measures alternative to the project depending on the initial eir eir ladies leads to new impacts my trigger an Environmental Review as far as the commissions authority until they receive their final Building Permit the project sponsors does not have a right to a permit they expire on august 15th so certainly in the commission wanted to take a look at the project it could calendar u calendar not today this is only an informational hearing it could schedule a future hearing. Thank you youve answered my questions are there any additional comments from the Zoning Administrator i think ms. Jones hinted by