Here is the clip in question with janine pirro of fox news for an interview to air saturday. Are you moving so quickly that your Communications Department cannot keep up with you. Yes. Thats true. What do we do about that . We dont have press
elliot necessary found it so hard the believe that he would have reassured the president that he is somehow not under investigation note once, and certainly not three times. Lets bring our Kickoff Panel on the, the veteran New York Times chief White House Correspondent peter baker is with us, who happens to be our newly minted msnbc political analyst. Vivian solana, and matthew nussbaum. Good evening to you all. Peter, i was watching you on Live Television slight after 4 00 p. M. Eastern time. Micolle wallace played the clip. That i cant talk about. I wont talk about that. All i want is for comey to be honest. Im sure he will be, i hope. You reacted in real time. Im not going to talk about that. You think this is a very serious moment right there.
trump s lawyer rudy giuliani. he s undeniably a central figure in a lot of these efforts following the 2020 election. he s currently not a subpoena target for the committee. why is that? and do you expect that will change? the committee has said over and over that pretty much anyone is on the table as far as who they want to talk to. and just because they haven t subpoenaed guiliani yet doesn t mean they won t in the future. we ve seen other folks that were in these willard hotel war room situations subpoenaed by the committee. we ve seen them go after other people in the former president s orbit that were involved in these efforts to overturn the election. it s very likely that at some point the spotlight will turn to giuliani himself if he hasn t already come forward to talk with them voluntary. nicholas wu, ali vitali, thank you both. still to come, more than 6 million americans live with alzheimer s. and msnbc s richard lui spoke
amendment privilege then and chose not to do it. so this is sig nifnificant on a number of levels because he would be the first subpoena target, the first witness to use the fifth amendment as way to not answer questions. the big question i want to make this last point, erin now, what does the committee do in terms of whether or not the full house votes on this resolution? that was something that we thought could happen as soon as tomorrow. do they hold off on bringing it to the full house until this situation with this deposition happens this weekend? that s still an open question that we need to get an answer to. but nonetheless, the committee s still moving forward with reporting out this criminal contempt referral of jeffrey clark. i don t know if you know the answer but obviously what we saw november 5th was question after question after question. they asked every question and he or his lawyer mr. clark or his lawyer, mr. mcdougal, would say i exert executive privilege, ri
i ll give you the last word. everyone loves a season finale. this reminds me where the president invited the reporters into the cabinet room and says welcome to the studio. he sees his presidency as an extension of his reality tv style approach to politics. that s something we re seeing play out with the way he dismissed rex tillerson via tweet, the way he got rid of his former chief of staff via tweet while the cameras were rolling. this is a president who sees this as a grand production. he s likely to make some changes and he s going to do so with a lot of fan fair and likes to keep everyone on their tows and guessing. that s why these reports are flying out about who is going to be the next to go. someone is going to be going and probably pretty soon. thanks so much for being with us. i do appreciate it. special counsel robert mueller, the next subpoena
perhaps. michael, i know lbj wanted in part for leverage to remind people what they had said or promised to him over the phone he always had the transcript if he needed it. if this current president is recording private conversations in the white house other than making himself a huge subpoena target, is there anything wrong with it? is there anything illegal? illegal is a question. in terms of shattering precedence and shattering things that presidents have been doing before ever since that day that you just showed with alexander butterfield in july of 1973, nixon had to immediately stop taping and pull out the system and later presidents have all said i will never do such a thing because it reminds people of nixon who behaved badly, but it violates people s civil liberties to record conversations with the president that are supposed to be private