Here is the clip in question with janine pirro of fox news for an interview to air saturday. Are you moving so quickly that your Communications Department cannot keep up with you. Yes. Thats true. What do we do about that . We dont have press
elliot necessary found it so hard the believe that he would have reassured the president that he is somehow not under investigation note once, and certainly not three times. Lets bring our Kickoff Panel on the, the veteran New York Times chief White House Correspondent peter baker is with us, who happens to be our newly minted msnbc political analyst. Vivian solana, and matthew nussbaum. Good evening to you all. Peter, i was watching you on Live Television slight after 4 00 p. M. Eastern time. Micolle wallace played the clip. That i cant talk about. I wont talk about that. All i want is for comey to be honest. Im sure he will be, i hope. You reacted in real time. Im not going to talk about that. You think this is a very serious moment right there.
how and when can women start a conversation about the spectrum and about not lumping all of these men into the same category? i think it s not yet. common sense is going to have to be applied, as with everything in life. but i think of all the topic perhaps in all of human history the most fraught is sex. sex and religion, maybe. so it s going to be a tough one. and i certainly thing we need we have to have it. but for thing to get better for women and to get better torment but it s going to be a tough one. my thanks. we are all out of time. i can t believe the time. i just looked at the clock. my thanks to the panel. that does it for our hour. i m micolle wallace. mtp daily starts right now with the fabulous katie tur in for chuck todd. if it is tuesday, president trump breaks his silence on roy moore. tonight president trump stands by judge moore. he denies it. look.
government to the private sector back to government with great ease but hiring these experts in their field. how do you limit the scope of your investigation? how do you diffy it up. i think you have to take it in different pieces. there is the piece during the campaign about the coordination with the russians and if that in fact occurred and looking at the campaign officials there. there is the question of what the russians did, the ways in which they did it, what their process is. that could be broader ranging the ways russia saw influence. and then the last piece is obstruction, trump s conversations with officials to try to get them to shut down parts of this. your colleague and mine, micolle wallace speaks with great affection about how tough you were in the bush white house and how many receipts she had to bring to you to prove every purchase and prove she hadn t accepted a cup of coffee from anyone. if you were appointed, the off chance that you were appointed
this might not be the last time he talks to those individuals. but given their testimony before congress the other week it s important he actually speaks with them and find out what they know and what the president said to them. which they said they would cooperate with the special prosecutor s office. how do you sit down if you try to get them to shut down parts of this. your colleague and mine, micolle wallace speaks with great affection about how tough you were in the bush white house and how many receipts she had to bring to you to prove every purchase and prove she hadn t accepted a cup of coffee from anyone. if you were appointed, the off chance that you were appointed ethics lawyer in house in this
micolle wallace played the clip. that i can t talk about. i won t talk about that. all i want is for comey to be honest. i m sure he will be, i hope. you reacted in real time. i m not going to talk about that. you think this is a very serious moment right there. i do. it s very striking. it s been 40 years since we had a president that we knew of anyway who wasrd recording on any regular basis, tape recording his conversations. there is a reason why other presidents haven t done it. because it didn t work out well for richard nixon, obviously. the idea that he is putting out there is either he is in fact taping conversations with the fbi director of all people or he is bluffing or misleading in order to intimidate somebody who might have conferring that he considers to be damaging i guess. either scenario is stunning i think for any white house. vivian, this would appear to be a second straight interview done perhaps outside the authority and track of the press shop in the west