Their political views what is the law of the constitution say attorneys general are supposed to be on the lawyer for the country what is their involvement with the president well thats a great question right and i think the world really changed after the whole nixon watergate situation you know at the end of the day each cabinet member serves at the pleasure of the president under the constitution for the president and if you believe the president is the boss they serve to the president and so that means that the attorney generals no different than the secretary of agriculture or the secretary of commerce and is not and so therefore serves for the president i think since watergate we have come to see the attorney and let me give an example of Bobby Kennedy was. The president s brother at and and certainly served to protect him i think since nixon weve changed our view and the prevailing view is then that the has been that the attorney general should be more independent and i think with
National conversation through cspans daily Washington Journal Program or through our social media feeds. Cspan created by americas Cable Television companies as a Public Service and brought to you today by your television provider. Theres no time to think or reflect. Hi, everyone. We are here digging up soil because were about to plant a garden. I wont be satisfied, nor will my husband, until every veteran and Military Spouse who wants a job has one. At the end of the day my most important title is mom in chief. In 2008 barack obama was elected as president. One year into a second obama turn, the first lady continues her focus on childhood obesity, military families and access to education. Good evening and welcome. Tonight is the final installment in our year long series, first ladies influence and image. We finish appropriately with first Lady Michelle obama. For the first 90 minutes well learn more about her biography and how shes approached the job in office so far. Let me introduc
With the lack of Economic Justice for black people and other minorities, not to mention native americans. So yes, there is a lot of work to be done. But considering where we were, in 1965, homosexuality was outlawed in every state, you didnt have any no lgbt people were represented and positively in the media anywhere. If there was a gay person in a movie, they had to be killed off or kill themselves. Considering where we were 55 years ago, where weve come today is really phenomenal. Again, i think thats because we can use the arguments and the examples, the great achievements of the africanamerican movement for civil rights, thats why so much has been done. But as it said, the price of freedom is eternal vigilence. One could also say the price of equality is eternal vigilance, too. And certainly there is yes, it is very sad that the gay youth still have to sometimes choose between their families and integrity, being true to themselves, and pay a price for it. Thank you. I think that t
Laws which were victorian and made it look as though you were being very hard and tough on the poorest people who ended up on the street sure nobody was allowed to sleep rough argues a rough sleeper time so i know all about that what happened was d the laws were not changed but people politically different needs to know were not going to bring people off script were not going to take them to call rough treatment for begging were going just going to completely ignore it but the problem was they didnt replace it with anything else so what looked like a very liberal well intentioned of look lets not punish the poorest among us they killed them and since then weve had many many deaths on the streets weve had an increasing amount of people on the streets so the oboist spent all of the energy and chance has the people with problems of ended up on the streets or mental institutions were closed so that happened children coming out to care in the Community Look who authorities care often ended
945 government that suited the creation of the n. H. S. He joins me now via skype from cambridge in england thank you so much for coming back on lord john birt im going to ask you obviously given that youve a campaign about the big issue the name of your magazine all your life it seems the government was able to solve the big issue overnight when it came to a pandemic does this mean that all these years it was a political decision to have homelessness in this country. It was a political decision it was a decision made in the late 19th fiftys and the 19th sixtys can still not allowing people to be on the streets because of the laws which were cool vagrancy laws which were victorian and made it look as though you were being very hard and tough on the poorest people who ended up on the street sure nobody was allowed to sleep rough argues a rough sleeper time so i know all about that what happened was d the laws were not changed but people politically different needs to know were not going