invalidated a vote legally taken. the absurdity the right you don t have a right to challenge who wouldn t challenge if the state wouldn t uphold the vote. that s that is absurdity. you are absolutely right. bill: say it again. absolutely right. bill: did you hear that everyone? shoutout on my correctness. leaves it in the hands of the state executive the ultimate decision. bill: to enforce a law or not. so anybody who voted for traditional marriage doesn t have any right to petition that their vote be upheld. you better vote for traditional marriage. better be sure jerry brown is the right attorney general because they have a veto right. it pains me to say this because i love this country but the supreme court is a political organization no longer looking out for the folks of the cob substitution. in my humble opinion. bill: all right. let s go to. there they are. good. let s go to nebraska. fremont, nebraska, a little town. and they voted folks at
statement because, this is the first time she offered it she has given many statements before she got to court this time. suddenly now she decides to spring on us that trayvon said get off. that s an important and material fact she never mentioned. if they believe it, it s good for the prosecution. bill: so when the police interviewed her about the murder or the killing, whatever you want to describe it as, the death, she didn t offer up that? right. bill: it just came in now. right. bill: do you believe this woman has credibility on the stand. i believe she has credibility on the first couple of statements. bill: then it just went. trayvon looked at zimmerman why are you following me for that s a quote and zimmerman looked back at him and said either what are you talking about or what are you doing here? she said that repeatedly in every interview she has given. to me, that s credible. i don t think that advances the case very much. but if the jury believes that get off
in that position. but that s where paula deen finds herself i will give you the last word. i don t think she is going to have everything taken away from her. she already has. exposure, restaurants, gone. she will come back part way. maybe. but she is 66 years old. does she deserve what she is getting? no. it seems extreme. i agree. but the mob is so concerned about being politically correct. bill: there is no doubt about it but ms. deen should have been more aggressive in confronting everything that she did. because i still don t know what she did. stossel thank you very much. when we come right back, actor jamie foxx wears trayvon martin t-shirt at the mtv awards. those reports after these messages.
book drops her. bill: walk through. this number one we invited paula deen to come on the program, okay? i m confused about what exactly other than using the n word and she says it was only on one occasion when she was emotionally distraught there are other allegations that shea ran businesses in racially insensitive manner. they are just allegations they haven t been proven. people sue over everything. bill: paula deen says no to the factor. won t come on to hash it out. that tells me she doesn t know what she is doing number one. the hearing she could get hear is quite different than the one she is going to get on the today show. that s with all due respect. i m not criticizing matt lauer of the today show. here it s going to be expansive conversation. all the department stores dropped out of her. her chef deal as you mentioned. food network. qvc, k-mart, walgreen s, taliban. tsunami of indignation has come over paula deen
the poll that you neglected to mention is the date it was taken. was taken the day after and the day after that of the major rulings of the court. now, whenever the court rules on something really large like the voting rights act or gay marriage. you know it s going to alienate and anger a large part of the popu think that is a temporary phenomenon you expect that at the end of june every year. i think generally speaking if you ask the same people six months, nine months hence, i think people will show there will be a lot different result. bill: maybe. they have a sense of respect for it but on the morning after a ruling when you are on the losing side, you are really steamed. bill: this time four years ago a 20 point drop. they were making rulings four years ago. the loophole thing is what gets me. as i said i have respect for the supreme court. kelly was a little sceptic call of my statement that throughout history i think they have done the right