statement because, this is the first time she offered it she has given many statements before she got to court this time. suddenly now she decides to spring on us that trayvon said get off. that s an important and material fact she never mentioned. if they believe it, it s good for the prosecution. bill: so when the police interviewed her about the murder or the killing, whatever you want to describe it as, the death, she didn t offer up that? right. bill: it just came in now. right. bill: do you believe this woman has credibility on the stand. i believe she has credibility on the first couple of statements. bill: then it just went. trayvon looked at zimmerman why are you following me for that s a quote and zimmerman looked back at him and said either what are you talking about or what are you doing here? she said that repeatedly in every interview she has given. to me, that s credible. i don t think that advances the case very much. but if the jury believes that get off
exactly the same thing. they will find a loophole, all right, to nullify the vote. well, they might. bill: they will. something similar in the arizona immigration case. bill: right. wait, wait, wait. the fact that you can predict how the supreme court is going to rule or make educated guess doesn t mean they are a political body. bill: no, no, no. means ideological bent. bill: wait a minute. i m going to ask this to krauthammer who is coming up behind miss megyn. have you covered the supreme court. yeah. bill: i have always had the utmost respect for the supreme court except the dred scott and slave things. i didn t like roe v. wade loophole. right now, aren t you kind of worried that the nation s fail safe which is what the supreme court is keeps control over the congress and the president is now gone away from that and is into politics? and finding a way to
bill: paula deen talking about using the the n word now her world is shattered. is that fair? john stossel will weigh in. caution, you are about to enter the no spin zone. the factor begins right now. bill: hi, i m bill o reilly. thanks for watching us tonight. the trayvon martin murder case and way to is important. that is the subject of this evening s talking points memo. lots of folks making fools of themselves over the case. if you are rooting for or against a conviction for george zimmerman, you are in that category. nobody not on the scene knows what happened that terrible evenings in sanford, florida. and speculate about the lives of two young americans not appropriate. all honest americans should let the justice system work. after hearing all the evidence, we are then entitled to an honest opinion, not based on race. for example, i believe o.j.
statement because, this is the first time she offered it she has given many statements before she got to court this time. suddenly now she decides to spring on us that trayvon said get off. that s an important and material fact she never mentioned. if they believe it, it s good for the prosecution. bill: so when the police interviewed her about the murder or the killing, whatever you want to describe it as, the death, she didn t offer up that? right. bill: it just came in now. right. bill: do you believe this woman has credibility on the stand. i believe she has credibility on the first couple of statements. bill: then it just went. trayvon looked at zimmerman why are you following me for that s a quote and zimmerman looked back at him and said either what are you talking about or what are you doing here? she said that repeatedly in every interview she has given. to me, that s credible. i don t think that advances the case very much. but if the jury believes that get off
for the only thing we know on the record is one time using the n word. it doesn t make any sense. does it? it is odd o. you would think she would be a republican and yet she even campaigned for president obama at one point. but, there was also this claim that she proposed a wedding for her brother with an all-black staff. gone with the wind theme. again, all of these are allegations that are not proved allegations. true. and come up in these sleazy lawsuits. you can t be convicting people even if you are in the market, all right. unless there is some kind of credible evidence. but ms. dean makes two mistakes. number one she goes on the web site and apologizes for a day and a half. what are you apologizing for, specifically? if it s just one use of the n word, why do you need a day and a half to do it? number two, why aren t you out making your case to the american people?