Were seeing the impacts of sea levels with high tides and their offer a preview of coastal effects interest if anyone has taken the opportunity at pier 6 its underwater just to give you a sense of what were we fatiguing today. The report this side slide illustrates what weve achieved is 14 point reduction below other levels. The red line you see here thats if we basically do nothing its our worstcase scenario. The orange line represents our project of the emissions under current policies everything were doing this today, well go back to the other levels. The blue lines represents if all 35 recommendations are laid out in the Action Strategy are complemented again, i fwl underscore. Just to give you a sense of what a exhaustible in San Francisco just a question regarding those slides we talk about the goals and benchmarks do we have limits that we have to abide by compared to that are the limits binding . The goals we set forth in San Francisco are not binding the statistical has goals
Expiration date well produce is no longer appealing to you and i thats ended up, you know, it maybe come posted portfolio but were still not takes into account all those different items. The other examples we use to explain in terms of calculating and how you measure and draw the line and garlic clove thats grown in gilroy we only account its an emissions value once a restaurant but the consumption model you have to look at when it w it w it was cultivated and brought into San Francisco water itself is used a lot in agricultural and used to grow in a place as where things are hard to buy so it seems like, you know, well, we cant havent written into law the consumption model its not an anecdotal way of measuring our consumption in the city and relative to Climate Change is good to do. This is one of the reasons the Climate Action strategy update in this iteration of the report we need to take ownership of the emissions were producing and try to elevate what kinds of recommendations we c
Switch to the next slide. Heres the two slides in comparison to give you a sense Climate Change i mentioned food and beverage is a significant amount and it was recently studied the amount of food and groceries that are throwing away because the product on shortfalls missed their Expiration Date well produce is no longer appealing to you and i thats ended up, you know, it maybe come posted portfolio but were still not takes into account all those different items. The other examples we use to explain in terms of calculating and how you measure and draw the line and garlic clove thats grown in gilroy we only account its an emissions value once a restaurant but the consumption model you have to look at when it w it w it was cultivated and brought into San Francisco water itself is used a lot in agricultural and used to grow in a place as where things are hard to buy so it seems like, you know, well, we cant havent written into law the consumption model its not an anecdotal way of measurin
Its an emissions value once a restaurant but the consumption model you have to look at when it w it w it was cultivated and brought into San Francisco water itself is used a lot in agricultural and used to grow in a place as where things are hard to buy so it seems like, you know, well, we cant havent written into law the consumption model its not an anecdotal way of measuring our consumption in the city and relative to Climate Change is good to do. This is one of the reasons the Climate Action strategy update in this iteration of the report we need to take ownership of the emissions were producing and try to elevate what kinds of recommendations we can created in order to truly hed that if you look at transportation in San Francisco the model they account for models into San Francisco and we take that responsibility and claim that in or numbers but f sf o traffic many of obvious travel and where do we calculate that impact is that assigned to our county when every san franciscan comes
A restaurant but the consumption model you have to look at when it w it w it was cultivated and brought into San Francisco water itself is used a lot in agricultural and used to grow in a place as where things are hard to buy so it seems like, you know, well, we cant havent written into law the consumption model its not an anecdotal way of measuring our consumption in the city and relative to Climate Change is good to do. This is one of the reasons the Climate Action strategy update in this iteration of the report we need to take ownership of the emissions were producing and try to elevate what kinds of recommendations we can created in order to truly hed that if you look at transportation in San Francisco the model they account for models into San Francisco and we take that responsibility and claim that in or numbers but f sf o traffic many of obvious travel and where do we calculate that impact is that assigned to our county when every san franciscan comes and goes when you take the