but it looks like potus found out hrc was using her personal e-mail in the news, then the e-mail makes its way to the top cliento clinton advisor, and she writes john podesta, we need to clean this up. he has e-mails from her. they did not say state.gov, proving president obama was in on the scandal. who is right here? i don t know who is right, but what i do know is that this would be an enormous issue in these closing weeks of the campaign if it weren t for donald trump. it s fascinating to me that hillary clinton has always said during her career she gets the short end of the stick with the media and she s often been right about that and she s catching an enormous break, which is the wikileaks story, and all the things we re seeing would be dominating your newscast if her opponent was not donald trump, someone who every day, in every way, provides juicier fodder,
responsive. 90% to 95% of them were on state.gov. i understand that the committee broadened the scope of their request, and i think that in response the state department has been trying to provide what you have requested. in the meantime, they re going through the process of making all of my e-mails public. you think our first request there were only eight e-mails responsive to our first request? i can t speak to it. i believe your first request was for benghazi, and i believe that the state department did a diligent search. then i believe you expanded it to libya and weapons and maybe a few other terms. and i believe they conducted our jurisdiction hasn t grown, madam secretary. our jurisdiction is the same thing it was. let me ask you this. you say that you turned over everything. i don t get a xhans to watch you a lot on television, but when i see you are interviewed you make a point of saying, i turned over everything. all my work-related e-mails.
state.gov addresses and they certainly pop up. and the inspector general report madam secretary, the report which you can t argue but perfect analogy but extrapolate the inspector general report found that less than 1%, less than 1% of state department e-mails, record e-mails were captured. so they give a number of less than 1% and you give a number of 90%. well, i don t know what you re referring to. i can only speak about my e-mails. my work-related e-mails. let s talk about your work-related e-mails. we asked for them last year and the state department gave us eight. if they had 90% of yours, why did we only get eight? i don t know initially what you asked for but i know that they tried to be responsive. 90 to 95% of them were on state.gov. i understand that the committee broadened the scope of their
you could go back to the dumpster, uncovered. it looks like an employee if i m not misunderstanding this image walking away after dumping something in there. correct? that s correct. we saw employees of the company dropping trash, lord knows what s in there, but this is the kind of trouble that i think hillary clinton is going to face tougher and tougher questions on. when you take classified information or any kind of private really, really top secret stuff out of the government domain and put it in the private domain, you re surrendering control and security of that information to whatever is the weakest link in the chain. now, of course, i don t think it s true that hillary clinton knew that her data would wind up in this particular company or anything like it. but the problem is you can t foresee what happens when you take information like that out of state.gov. a system set up specifically to deal with this and put it in a domain where you have no control
again, i think it s important to remind it wasn t a violation of policy. it s not a violation of policy now as long as e-mails that you are sending from a private like your yahoo account are docume documented on the state.gov account. there s times you have no choice. we want people to use government account. a lot of e-mails were born classified. if i write talking about north korea s nuclear situation, that s classified even though not stamped classified. shouldn t someone in government know whether sending or receiving? those are things investigators and reviewers are looking at. the born classified argument is not black and white as some may think. i m not making defense one way or other. everybody has the responsibility