mends. embarrassing now but you will get over it. help me find a discrete lover. i like to please the one i m with. reporter: wire.com s kim zetter has gone through the massive data dump including customer profiles and soon anyone could be able to search through it. a lot of people have downloaded it. you can probably imagine that in the next couple of days someone is going to create a searchable website for this data. reporter: perhaps most surprisingly 15,000 addresses allegedly belonging to military or government employees, including domains like.mil, schools like nyc.gov, state.gov, house.gov, senate.gov. though many are obviously fake including presiden president @whitehouse.gov. white house e-mails use a different domain name, eop.gov. other leaked addresses appear to include corporate executive, vatican staff, members of the u.n. and british government. a member of parliament says her
other side here say, well, there was information that before these e-mails were forwarded to an outside e-mail should have raised some eyebrows, things about military intelligence, about the movement of gadhafi s forces and that kind of thing that should have perhaps raised some concern about putting them into an even further unclassified system. yeah, pete, and the fact they were from a state.gov to an outside server is something that they have been mentioned. thanks for being with me. appreciate it. okay. on the heels of the e-mail kroef controversy, a new poll shows democrats might be looking elsewhere. a quinnipiac poll out this morning shows joe biden running as well or better than hillary clinton in general election matchups against republicans in florida, ohio, and pennsylvania. vice president s favorability in those states are also slightly better than the current front-runner, but clinton is crushing all opponents in those
assumption that the e-mail was not secure unless they can prove it was secured. in 2012 when hillary clinton was secretary of state, the inspector general of the state department issued a blistering report about a u.s. ambassador in kenya, and one of the many things he was hammered for was for using a private e-mail address instead of using the state.gov, the official government e-mail address. is there a reason why that would have been more vulnerable in kenya than secretary clinton using her private e-mail in new york or wherever the server was based? well geography is part of it. obviously when you re traveling over an unsecure network, whether in kenya or the united states it s vulnerable to attack. when you re outside the united states of course you may be traveling through a network that is owned by a foreign government.
that was, remember when he arrived at the state department, state dove e-mails were so antiquated that he had to put computers on every single desk and start getting people to use the state.gov e-mails. he started using his state.gov account as an example to everyone else. 2001 the systems of e-mail were totally inadequate. and the question is why did hillary clinton use a different system when she required all of her employees at the state department to use the state.gov accounts. and it seems adequate for her successor, john kerry. it s very important to get a go rant in in the morning. you got to start with the rule. i m castro? that s why he married you.
but being secretary of state and the types of things she was doing and the department of state having these rules changes the context of this behavior doesn t it? it s troubling. but to extend this point. colin powell used private email when he was secretary of state. only? well not uniquely but it was overwhelmingly where he did all of his communications. and the first secretary of state to use state.gov is john kerry. it hadn t been done before. it s a little troubling. is it troubling because the state department was behind the times? or is it troubling because hillary clinton was doing something that seems to oppose transparency? or both? well for me as a journalist it s troubling that we have a robust freedom of information law that says all government information is presumptively public with a couple of exceptions for confidentiality and national security and so forth and it seems the policy is disregarded in administration after administration at multiple