Culpable if not more culpable than the person who knows the facts. Youre going to send him up the river for 15 years. Again we believe is justice culpable . We think certainly its sufficient if the government can prove that the defendant knowingly distributed a drug believing it to be illegal to do so. Whether or not he knew what provision of law. Illegal because in fact its bad for animals and the law involved prevents veterinarians from using this kind of drug for animal treatment. Thats all he knows. Thats all he thinks. Now, hes guilty of this statute. That doesnt tend to show at all that knowledge that he knows its an analog. In your opinion, because he feels guilty, as perhaps he should, hes guilty of violating this law. Well, we do believe that would establish the necessary culpable state of mind. Gr can you give me any authority for that . Your example of willful blindness is an example of where in fact in respect to this law he knows there is a risk he is violating doing the c
The chaplain loving and gracious god, we ask that you pour out your blessings on our nation this day. May these men and women who are called here today as representatives of the people of this country be given an inspired vision of the common good and may they meet the challenges they face with resolve and righteousness. May your grace bestow upon the members of this house a lively hope and the virtues of justice, wisdom, and compassion. That they may be instruments of your holy will, in carrying out their noble vocation as public servants. We pray that the work of this house will contribute to the flourishing of this nation so that all peoples and families will be raised in dignity, encouraged in solidarity, and blessed with ordered liberty. We ask this through christ our lord who raines forever and ever. Amen. The speaker pro tempore pursuant to sks 2a of House Resolution 134, the journal of the last days proceedings is approved. The chair will lead the house in the pledge of allegia
There are Russian Forces in ukraine, we believe they are responsible for commanding control, arming, financing directing of this conflict. We also believe there are many hundreds of russian dead in ukraine edit does pose a vulnerability for the kremlin politically at home. One quick point. I read in your statement, is its not accurate that as these bodies are returning to russia, russian families of the dead shoulders soldiers are told do not comment on it or they are denied death benefits . Yes. Thank you. Senator mendez had a closing question. Thank you. Madam secretary the budapest memorandum was basically a way to entice the craniums to give up their nuclear weapons, is that it are statement . At the time, the primary intent was for russia to get russia to a short ukraine it would not seek to take advantage of ukraines sovereignty and territorial integrity if it gave out its weapons. There was never an intent to have treaty obligations. You said it was a political agreement, right
Can happen regularly. If an officer will come in and say im not concerned about whether you filled tout the form. I think there might be a prostitute in room 3 and use it for criminal law. Mr. Goldstein, i thought an equally important purpose behind this law is, as you said earlier, prevent harassment. I dont like this hotel owner. I want to drive this hotel out of business. Im going to be showing number his lobby every day. Thats part of whats going on here, right . In fact the principal thing this courts precedence has pointed to look whats missing in this ordinance. Every time they say we identify specifically the records. The question isnt what the records are. Its the loss of sense of tranquility provided by the Fourth Amendment. We dont know how frequently and harassing purpose and what reasons at all if Police Officer will come in over and over again. Have we used that phrase before . Which one . Tranquility . I dont think that word is. Talk about privacy and all that. Im not su
His argument, as i interpret it, is the court cannot avoid making normative judgments about whether practices demean or humility humiliate or reduce people of a status of inferior caste, in violation of the sovereigns duty to govern impartially. In fact, cases have not delineated three or even one or two defined standards. Rather they recite that continuing of continuum of judgment responses. What is the best argument for 2 . That was the best answer before craig given by the Supreme Court. What were the two spheres of standards . Familiar strict scrutiny or fundamental right or deferential scrutiny when there was no such classification in play. We should remember it was a forced decision in dandridge and rodriguez, articulating 2 tiers that prompted Justice Marshall against rigid to tier analysis. What is the best argument for three . That is the best answer, given by the Supreme Court in crank. Where is the third standard intermediate standard for genderbased classifications. I will