Current clergy will be required to solemnize the marriage. Religious conflict is not a basis for denying fundamental rights. If and when the case was presented the court would have to balance competing Constitutional Rights the way it always has. The court is required to do this. You look at the hierarchy of rights and the level of intrusion. The court would render a decision. We have alleged that intermediate scrutiny applies here because plaintiffs as gay and lesbian persons qualify because of class status. We renew that argument here and differ to the brief and the wonderful brief of the lot institution professors. Just briefly we believe the Equality Foundation could be revisited. It does not require a decision because there is an inconsistent decision, Equality Foundation was inconsistent with the Supreme Court that requires modification. The decision, it could be the court a class the applies the cleburne factors. Davis scarborough did not have to address the standard of scrutiny
Birds from nesting in capitals. When we started this project, there was a major water event in of 1990 that deposited a large amount of water on the floor of the rotunda and it was through our investigations that we discovered bird nesting materials and debris from eating dome was what clogged the gutter system, caused the water the interstitial space and cascade into the rotunda so weve taken on a series of projects since that time to ensure that the drainage system is never compromised again by debris and it led to the development of the master plan and the study of the iron work and to the project that were now going to get completed years. Next two [captions performed by national captioning institute] [captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2014] on the next washington brandus looks at president obamas relationship with the press and his administrations goals for 2014. Then Jonathan Bialosky discusses apprehended from the border will be removed from the country. That, Ri
Changes will get the subsidies as well. Host victor is next on the line for democrats. Good morning. Caller good morning. Merry christmas. I have two questions. Is the the one that [indiscernible] me, it says that corporations being a person is an instrument by attorneys and makes them dots basically. Gods i do know that there has been a case or situation and the Supreme Court with a person with the oldest or the longest on the in the courts automatically placed [indiscernible] and opened up [indiscernible] guest on the first question is important to emphasize that asking the question, are corporations people or persons is probably not the right way to frame the question. I want to emphasize from a constitutional lore yours point of view. There are prosecutions for engaging. Constitutional lawyers point of view. Rightsve constitutional to a fair trial whether prosecuted for unlawful pollution. The real question is, do corporations have constitutional force in a specific setting . And t
Just entitlements. Entitlements is a problem because thats 60 of the total budget goes to entitlements. Lets keep in mind theres also Discretionary Spending that is nondefense Discretionary Spending. And we the first thing that was done, if you all remember when this president took office, was to take 800 billion for a stimulus. None of that was used for the military. That was all for the stimulus. That obligated us on nondefense Discretionary Spending for the rest of the time at the expense of defense. And so now were in a situation that is so serious in this country that even our military leaders have come out and made statements. And im going to read a couple of these. They need to be in here because people have to understand how critical this situation is and how we have disarmed this country. Secretary hagel two weeks ago, he said listen carefully to this, madam president american dominance on the seas, in the skies and in space can no longer be taken for granted. Is this america
Some of these areas . It is still the culture of revenge. Are there groups that are willing partners of terrorist . They know the sectors exist in theyre going to do it they need to did. I mention the country of iran. They have definitely helped hezbollah. Theres the question about that. Do we let them do what they do . There are cases of terrorists moving in the country does not do anything about it. Do you think goes on in other countries . Theres no question about it. We talk about the peaceful muslims in the radical muslims which we considered to be about 10 . When the radical muslims pressure the peaceful muslims, will they stand up for they claimove that they have that they get to enjoy in america under the liberty that we have and stand up and die instead of submitting to the oppression of the minority. Peaceful muslims in many countries on earth to stand up more. I fear some of them do not stand up. Fearould americans have a of sharia law . I hear people tell me this all the ti