in the city not to know there was blood on the paback of his head. you are defending a prosecutor because you are a prosecutor. you are 100 percent wrong. listen to me. i am not defending anybody if they did something in bad faith. the funny and interesting thing is the defense attorney who is an excellent defense attorney you don t hear him going on a tv station and saying the prosecution held back anything. it s a bond hearing. we are at the bond hearing stage. we are going to go to a commercial. up next did george zimmerman or his family members purger themselves when they claim they would destitute when they were sitting on over
zimmerman s bloody head and didn t give it what about that? you are swearing to tell the whole truth. you submit an affidavit that includes the ed that is not only unethical it is probably criminal. do you see it a different way? of course i do. in any affidavit when you present it at a bond hearing you are not at the discovery phase. sometimes probable cause affidavits are there were elements of you would have to say, it doesn t necessarily mean that the crime didn t happen because he had bruises and a scratch on the back of his head. let me tell you something you would have to you would have to make an argument that the prosecutor proceeded in bad faith. i have no probable cause. that is not a judgment for us to
obliged in the affidavit. they swear to toll tell the trud the whole truth. you are not supposed to keep back evidence that maybe you can use later. this is a public case. everybody knows what the evidence is. we know there are bruises in the back of the head. sglirm man it s not in the affidavit. we don t know who started the fight. it says in the affidavit zimmerman confronted martin and a struggle ensued. past tense. the struggle ensued. after the bail herring who started it? i don t know. this isn t poker. you don t play with two of our cards down. if you are a prosecutor and you are submitting affidavits like this you put your evidence forward. the only reasonable inference there is no reasonable inference in this affidavit. if you read this without knowing anything about the background you say i don t even see a crime here. what s the crime? there are no morrell ements stated for any of the crime. what if the prosecutor knew of the photographer of george
did george sglirm man purger himself or family members purger themselves under oath on the stand claiming they were all broke. was it a simple omission or willful disregard for the truth? should there be a hearing about that? continuing with special prosecut prosecutor is there something nefarious here? certainly under the rules of criminal procedure in florida if there are omissions and misrepresents made a bond hearing they have right to ask for bail revocation or ask for bail to be increased to whatever it is. at the time they went under oath and made a material statement they were indigent and had no funds. the judge will take it under advisement and make that determination. also under the rules if there has been an intentional problem it can be a felony. interesting to see what the testimony to the judge was with
will president obama sit down to be interrogated by prosecutors in this case? listen, chris, i m not going to get into that right now. the question is this investigation should be treated seriously. this is chris: why not say yes if he is asked he will participate? i m not running the investigation, okay. we have career law enforcement professionals and prosecutors who are going to look into th s this. the president and his administration want the investigation to be as thorough as possible. chris: will the president cooperate including i m not going to answer his particular involvement right now, chris. the point is everyone in our administration and problems for the agencies as well, of course, is going to cooperate with the investigation. chris: the white house says it there is no need for an independent prosecutor. you mentioned two u.s. attorn y attorneys appointed by attorney general eric holder to look at that. back in 2006 in the case of senator abram move senat