Guy and the entire biden family operatioamion but n, but especiy joe biden, because today he announced the appointmentanns a Special Counsel to investigate possible hunterme crimes. But of course, he made no pre mention of president joe biden. Instead of appointing someone from outside of the government to lead this investigation, as by law, by the way,on is recommended under regulationn 28 c. F. R. 601. 3. Thanks to gregg jarrett, merriccsr k waved his magic wank and he just promotede david weiss. That is the same federal prosecutorsa , th, The One Who N been slow walking the criminal probe into Huntenter Bidr Bidenr several years. Hes the guy that allowed the statute of limitations to expire on multiple major felonies before majoe, of cours, then trying to put together that sweetheart, you kno w, little deal with hunter, no Jail Timane Ite and tie it up w, Neat Little Bow and, you know, h wover it all up. A Sweetheart Deal that Noejecte One Else will get. That, of course, rejected by
,russia, ukraine, kazakhstan. romania? what did hunter do for these countries to earn all of that moned after y? and after all of this, why would merrick garland appoint merrpoins as a special prosecut? why? because the fi?why?x was in. this is what we have beeng you fotelling you for a long time. this is what a politicized and and a weaponized department of justice looks like with hunter s plea deal dead in the water. garland and weiss. well now they would now be able to use this new special counsel investigatio n that will buyil them time that will stall any future hunter trial that see will they ll attempt. let s see if it works. they will attempt to block all and any congressional inquiries and let even more statute of limitations run ou rt. but remember, they re not protecting not hunter, who, remember, was an admitted crack addict the time, while all these deals with tens of millions of dollars weres
nobody knows, the acting attorney general and he has the authority to appoint an independent prosecutor. we ve seen that before. when attorney general ash croft recused himself. jim and do you see that happening likely because of the meetings with ambassador? i think it should. i think a straight shooter with the former u.s. attorney in the district of virginia and i think like any other good attorney general, there should be an investigation. it doesn t mean a prosecution, but you ve got to get to the facts and the fact that mr. sessions is going to amend in writing, that doesn t do it. he s got to go back in front of senate judiciary, if you appear before a committee, be put back under oath and then clarify, not written. that s not the way to do it. do you see that potentially happening because there are some within the senate judiciary who
and it also poses a threat. a scandal of this sort can really consume a white house. and so, steve, with us on the phone now, while attorney general sessions has recused himself from anything related to the investigation of the russians and involved with u.s. elections, is it your view there needs to be a special prosecutor involved even though there are also committees on capitol hill that need to continue forward with its investigations. is this right for a special prosecut prosecutor? yes, i think it s time for some sort of independent mechanism to get involved here. the reason is is because what the russians manage to accomplish in this multipronged influence campaign they were able to conduct during the presidential election could be worse if there was some sort of cooperation or collusion between the trump campaign and the russias. we don t know that. that s why the investigations are going on and that s probably
say they want him to testify again, they want to ask him questions in addition to the supplement he ll be offering for confirmation hearings? he should, but he won t. and do you see it potentially happening though, richard? no. there s no way he s going to appear before that committee again and answer verbal questions. if invited or if that is the decision of the judiciary committee, how would he refuse that? he would just refuse it. he s the acting attorney general. there are no charges brought against him. he s no way going to go before them again because he blew it the first time. answer with a team of lawyers and prepare responses. as far as special prosecutor, there is no more special prosecutor statute. that expired in 99 and independent prosecutor who does not answer to the department of justice and the the president must be appointed here, fred,