good faith ask questions and be concerned even when we are very, very happy brittney griner is back in the u.s. what does this do? does this hurt morale in the justice department? i mean, i know officially justice was against this decision but would always have been. this is standard policy to be against that. but does it sap morale? i don t know. okay. look, prosecutors generally when they ve held someone accountable, particularly a dangerous person like viktor bout are not excited about letting them out of prison early. he served 15 years. another about seven to go. they are certainly not excited as a general principle. when it is an asymetric trade, someone very dangerous being traded for someone who hadn t
to hide? i knew i had nothing to hide. and when investigators determined there was no evidence placing adam at the scene they cleared you? they did. did you think this was over at that point? yes, i did. it wasn t over. rebecca s sister was determined to hold someone accountable. i m guessing that somebody said to you that filing a lawsuit, a civil lawsuit, to financers, in a criminal matter is generally an extremely unsatisfying way of pursuing justice? that may be, but my only recourse was the lawsuit. soon, they would start to get answers, just not the ones they expected. coming up. where was dina the night of rebecca s death? this eyewitness was adam, he was very clear, no doubt about it. powerful new video evidence and the dna evidence. where was it?
january 6th select committee and the very high-profile testimony of people like cassidy hutchinson and mike pence s most senior aides. and this new probe now known to exist under this new special counsel? well, they re fairly different. in a congressional hearing, you can present basically any type of evidence that you would like. you can present things that are not directly from an individual that, you know, someone heard someone else say about another conversation, not firsthand witnesses. and in a criminal trial, the bar is just much higher. and that is something that we ve seen time and time again with trump. which is that it is very difficult to hold someone accountable, especially someone at the level, you know, as a president or a former president. and the bar to getting evidence in, to meeting the standards that the justice department needs in order to bring a criminal case is just much more difficult than, you know, people
i knew i had nothing to hide. and when investigators determined there was no evidence placing adam at the scene, they cleared you? they did. did you think this was over at that point? yes, i did. it wasn t over. rebecca s sister was determined to hold someone accountable. i m guessing that somebody said to you that filing a lawsuit, a civil lawsuit, to finance a criminal matter is generally an extremely unsatisfying way of pursuing justice? that may be, but my only recourse was the lawsuit. soon, they would start to get answers, just not the ones they expected. coming up. where was dina the night of rebecca s death? this eyewitness was adam, he was very clear, no doubt about it. powerful new video evidence and the dna evidence. where was it? adam shacknai admits that
all staged like this has been an accident. or some unusual events. so, we just, three times. come on guys. even the police couldn t not see what had happened here. and so. i think hollywood would reject this script? i have said that many times. i said, if i wrote the stuff they would send me down the road for this. the families devastation would soon turn into determination. to hold someone accountable. coming up! police had to look at you as a potential suspect? myself in the cleaning lady. yeah. they had us both sitting in the kitchen. police also want to talk to caleb s estranged wife again. one of the last people to see him alive. we didn t speak at the time, just acknowledge the fact that he was there. when dateline continues! when dateline continues