here s the issue. the first issue is that the insanity defense is looked upon with great skepticism. why? because i can t look into your mind. a juror cannot look into your mind. in the event that you re ill, i could see you and notice signs that you re ill. that s demonstrable. it s tangible. you can prove it. in the event i can t do that, i have to rely upon what you tell me. a jury needs a reason to find someone accountable. i think the prosecution gave them ample reason, not just because of the issues that paul laid out, the premeditation, the deliberation, but everything else that pointed to a rational person. yesterday an expert testify that had this was a sneak attack. what happened? routh waited until littlefield and kyle represented no danger, then he attacked. what does that tell you? a person is sane and can clearly distinguish between right and wrong. fred, the former prosecutor in you, you hear that opposing counsel is going to mount an insanity defense.
decades took place. because of that, because of what kerry called an moral obscenity, he said the president will hold someone accountable. now the only question is what kind of action. i m told it will be military. then you re going to have, again, the political divide between the john mccains on the one hand who believe as you just pointed out cruise missiles are not enough and others like bob corker and other members of the republican and democratic party who believe that a response which punishes assad without having without trying to remove him, without a long military campaign is enough. and you know, andrea, a lot of this feels familiar a lot like the run-up to the war in 2003. you have issues of weapons inspectors not allowed to do their job, these issues of wmd, chemical weapons. bob cork ker more on the less hawkish side than john mccain and some of the neoconservative members on the hill pushing for robust military action.
facebook and social media and texting as part of evidence for grounds for divorce so i don t think women or men are forgiving what s going on. thank you. one line secret to people who want to make it work? hold someone accountable. set boundaries and hold men or your woman accountable for what you expect for them to do and make sure you have someone who believes in what you believe in. all right. and check their facebook. check their texts and facebook. you never know. that s the wloel thihole thi social media and sexting and facebook. it makes a difference there. trust but verify. trust but verify. charles johnson also the author of how to find the right one and make it last. let s hope that comes true. good to see you, charles. thank you very much. good advice. that s a loaded subject, isn t it? all right, up next this is always good to get, rare access inside a country we do not normally get to see. we re talking about north korea, this is where reporte
and investigating what the doj are doing to journalism. these are real scandals and they are looking to congress to hold someone accountable. and the truth is, the president cannot outrun these things. he keeps trying. we are going to talk about shutting down coal plants. and i want to talk about immigration. i want to talk about anything and everything, but the plague that is on the scandalobra that is on he decides to get serious. look at the irs, it is time for the president to act like his career depends on it. it does and get serious. liberals are blasting the supreme court ruling and striking down part of the voting rights act.
of the justice department. the report looks into the failed policy that put u.s. guns in the hands of criminals on the mexican border. two of those weapons were linked to the murder of border patrol agent brian terry. you might recall house lawmakers held attorney general eric holder in contempt of congress for refusing to hand over documents related to fast and furious . william la jeunesse has been following the case from the very beginning and joins us from los angeles with an update. william? reporter: when fast and furious broke you remember holder appointed the inspector general to find out what went wrong and who was response afblt only then would he say he would hold someone accountable. that was 20 months ago. now we are toiled that the ig report is complete. sources tell me it has been forwarded to the attorney general for review. it should be public in 30 days. there may be no one left to discipline. in highly unusual arrangement, holder and administration are allowing