Decide what it is and who gets to decide on two issues and whether a District Court can disregard a directly on Point Holding by the United States Supreme Court namely baker versus nation and whether term rights whether there will be a new right whether it should be done through the amendment process or courts on the due process doctrine. So theres Common Ground on this case, but the u. S. Constitution doesnt directly address samesex marriage, seems to turn to the subject of due process. The relevant test is is whether or not the right thats being asserted is objectively, deeply rooted in this nations history and tradition. And implicit in the concept of liberty such that you cant conceive of liberty or Justice Without it and samesex marriage does not have that necessary historical deep root. Its something what do you say about the fact that one could have said the same thing about lawrence . Well, with respect to lawrence, the Lawrence Court has not directly addressed it but something
More for the aging and dying. Sunday after 7 00, naomi kline on capitalism and the impact on climate change. On American History tv, the curator and director of the museum in virginia, tony explains the museums mission of preserving and presenting the agencys history and saturday at 8 00 p. M. Eastern, the king georges war of the 1740s and how it helped establish regional identities and how it gave fighting experience for their own revolution. Sunday night on the presidency at 8 00 p. M. , president forts pardon me on the nixon pardon. Find our schedule at cspan. Org and let us know what you think. Call us or email us. Or send us a tweet at cspan comments. Like us on facebook and follow us on twitter. A panel in since natty heard oral arguments on the constitutionality on the samesex marriage ban. They have yet to issue the decision in the case. On monday, the Supreme Court decided not to hear cases involving gay marriage bans in other states. Michigan was not among the states so the b
Cspan, cspan2, cspan radio and cspan. Org. Bob erlich was in henniker, New Hampshire where he held a town hall meeting at new england college. The former governor who is considered a president ial run in 2016 discussed political discourse in washington the importance of compromise and his views on marriage. This is just over an hour. [multiply conversations taking place] [multiply conversations taking place] [multiply conversations taking place] good afternoon, everyone, on behalf of the center for sieving engagement i mind like to welcome you to the new england college. I am a Political Science major and it is my pleasure to introduce governor bob erlich. He has served as governor member of Congress State legislature and civil litigator. Most recently he advised clients on an array of Government Matters with focus on health care, finance and economic development. As marylands first republican governor in 36 years when elected he turned four billion in deficit into two billion in surpl
Commissioner matsuda that expected to be absent first on your junked is Public Comment please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones code please be advised that the chair may order the removal from the meeting room of any person s responsible for the ringing or use of a applying if you have the one speaker card richard and good afternoon commissioners my name is rishtd rothman i want to talk about measure rallies mile favorite subject the commission the assessment started on the building at the zoo and hopefully, well on houch that will cost and to reopen the building the murals except for that the western wall they look fantastic and the other issue the skubtd mural the George Washington high school that makes the coit tower the most concentration of the murals is at George Washington it is not National Landmark so working with supervisor eric mars and heritage and your staff we can bring this about and fix up those about how far murals and get the recognition that those mur
I guess its just odd to me that state legislatures dont get a little bit of the benefit of the doubt in terms of when the pacing is right for them. Ms. Stanyar again, in michigan it doesnt matter what the legislators do anymore. Its a constitutional ban. Judge sutton four of the states did this through initiatives. In other words, four of the states ruled that it came out the right way in your clients perspective through initiatives. Initiatives are just as effective as legislation on this point. Ms. Stanyar ourselves would have to be repealed. We talked about that already. In addition, judge freedman found that the constitution is for the here and now. This court doesnt have the luxury of dodging a constitutional dodging a constitutional challenge. I understand that the court in perry didnt decide the ultimate question. The court looks to be telegraphing in windsor in terms of some doctrinal change, and if the court was intending on telegraphing, it worked. But 20 straight decisions w