Dick cheney is a robot many indisputable proof, big foot spotted in northern california, and mans 174 mile per hour sneeze blows wifes hair off. Over on fox, the feeling was, the interview went pretty well. You and i frayeded a lot of papers ah, and its been a good conversation, thank you, sir. Thank you very much. With that, a friendly reminder, theres always a paper trail on the ridiculis. Thank you, anderson. Well argued. I am chris cuomo, welcome to prime time. The president making the case that he has done nothing wrong. This case seems to be plagued by contradictions. Were going to test them with Kellyanne Conway. And the president s good friend says the president was in the room when the plan was hatched to pay off women who threatened
his campaign. Legal exposure for that . Well take it up in cuomos court. Criminal prosecution is a maybe. Political skrut any, 100 . Specifically if the president is shown to be lying about key issues. How bad could it be . Lots to test, lets get
constitutional right of free speech. look it all all snark and joking and back-and-forth. the sayyed, the idea of what he s saying right now, the gag order violating his free speech, particularly in such a high-stakes legal moment for him is there validity to that there is zero validity to that. in fact, donald trump doesn t understand the law behind the first amendment. the first amendment and only protects certain types of speech. it s, it s limited and the law does not allow someone to engage in speech that could cause harm to the community. there s a very famous supreme court case. you re not allowed to yell fire in a crowded movie theater if there s no fire that s not free speech in this particular case, this just gone on for ever that judges have put gag orders in effect during trials. there are witnesses to protect their litigants, to protect this it is perfectly reasonable
set a trial date on this case. so, she will set a trial date. is there any contempt of court on this, if they do not respond? do expect that to happen, katie? well, it is an order by the court. and if you do not abide by the court order, certainly, contempt of court is an opportunity for the court. now, with the judge go that far? who knows, she may try to set a tone from the get-go. that says i m not gonna suffer, and from what we, know she doesn t suffer fools in this particular district. so, i think if you are trump s counsel, you better stop talking all over the news today, and maybe you better be doing that red line. danny, we understand from just history what the strategy is from typical trump legal teams. what is trump s teams argument this time against this request for a protective order and wanting a delay of days? really, at the core, they are just saying, we don t have enough time. as the justice department, the doj saying in their filing, which is well within, but s
really well. it was them acting out. they were grumpy to the court and put them in the naughty way chair and didn t let them do the thing they wanted to do, which would ve been catastrophically limited access to mifepristone. what we so saw with so much snark. that s nerc you lead with, which is really, we are going to talk abandoned things that are just not true, about the fba not being in good faith, the fda maybe will not follow instructions. maybe we should talk about how we re starving babies in the womb. like, the degree of creepy bad fox news discourse as opposed to serious judicial fact-finding was dispiriting from a federal judicial i ve got to say, at the risk of sounding like pollyanna or rick then we cool, i just woken up from hundred years of slumber, i am still shocked that there is this cabal of