a few days of paid leave. vivek ramaswamy executive chainman of strive magment. there is not enough snark for this but there shouldn t be any. this is serious stuff. why would he do that? i think it s another senseless act and it is some of it is not even can t be explained. harris: he has no credibility. he had no credibility before. part of the deeper problem in our media. the same people who mainstream media get promoted to speak out have no grounding in principle in the issues they engage on. i care about the substance of it. one of the more interesting proposals she made that i like is the idea of term limits for elected officials. take it out of the age debate. you fix on age. what is the principle here?
snark? you were the assistant attorney general for legislative affairs if the attorney s point was questioning the documents from the doj was simply to be told no and put out the tweet and go on networks and say look, the doj is stone walking us, does any really oversight actually happen? it does let me give you two examples, anderson the highest profile examples of congressional oversight last several years two high ones one benghazi and two fast and furious, which i was there at that time, both of those were contentious and had letters like this traded back and forth but they both ended up in documents turned over to an administration of another party. it happens and it is a process of negotiations, now, look, there s politics to this you and i we all know this and live in a world where short of a response saying sure, mr. jordan, come on over and bring your friend and just let s start looking newer merrick garland s rug, short of that you ll get that kind of tweet from jim jorda
i m wondering. you have known him for a long time. how do you think all of this is impacting him, especially given this is some pretty targeted statements against him. there s been more than snark. there has been really deriding him and denigration. i wonder how you think he is receiving all of this. i refer to him as a happy warrior in that he listens. he learns. he engages. he negotiates. i don t think this is as embarrassing as you might expect. he has the ability to bring people together in a way most politicians can t or don t want to. i think that is so essential right now in this environment of resentment and polarization and how toxic it is. i see kevin as the perfect
how do you think all of this is impacting him, especially given there have been some pretty targeted statements against him, there has been more than snark, there has been really deriving him and emigration and i wonder how you think he is receiving all of this. well, i refer to him as a happy warrior. in that he listens, he learns, he engages, he negotiates. i don t think this is as embarrassing as you might expect. i don t think this is as embarrassing as you might except. he has the ability to bring people together in a way that most politicians either can t or don t want to. and i think that that is so essential right now in this environment of resentment and polarization and how toxic it is, i see kevin as the perfect example of someone who can get the job done because everyone is a participant.
was to women you belong. i wonder what you think the message to women is with this ig report? it s sending a very negative message. it s sending a message not just to women but everybody in the military, don t stand up to these maga lies and attacks, don t defend your force otherwise you ll be punished for it, that does send a negative message to women in the military for sure and everybody else. i think it s very demoralizing, since my column came up, i saw commentary on twitter and elsewhere saying what is the army thinking? they need to get it right. they need to make clear that general donohoe did not do anything wrong. the army ig didn t approve, clearly, of what they felt was general donohoe s snark in some cases. do they have a point? oh, come on. this is such mild snark by the standards of twitter, so