Across the atlantic. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said there would be no chance of a trade agreement with the u. S. If Boris Johnsons action threatens hes in northern ireland. Meanwhile, Boris Johnson is defending his comments in which he intentionally downplays the severity of this coronavirus. President told author and Journalist Bob Woodward he likes playing down concerns to avoid panic. Democratic president ial nominee joe biden said trump failed to do his job and is responsible for tens of thousands of deaths for not getting adequate warning about the dangers of the virus. Now, one in five companies in coveringwith only just debt Interest Payments according to the conservative think tank onward. It is called for the chancellor to relax the rules on virus loans repayments, warning the economic recovery will be hampered by crippling levels of corporate debt. It says borrowing sense lockdown began, threatening to push more than 4 of companies, employing almost only 2 Million People int
Coming up shortly, we bring you an exclusive conversation with the ceo of Goldman Sachs, it David Solomon. He will join us and give us his take on the banks involvement in the aramco ipo. Let us talk about what is going on in the markets. This is the picture we get from the futures. Cac futures pointing higher. U. S. Futures also suggesting they are moving to the upside on the equity story at the moment. Let us think about where we have at anrom the dow alltime high catching up with the other u. S. Benchmarks. Global stocks up 19 year to date. The trade story is once again guiding the narrative. The Asian Session has been dominated for the most part. Broadly, the narrative around trade is news out of the u. S. And china and that there is as urge going on for a venue to sign phase one. And the discussion of the rollback of tariffs. Some of the emergingmarket equity market going higher and we are seeing money coming out from the yen as well which goes hand in hand with the risk on story.
Secondly the letter of approval is usually included by, excuse me by the permit holder. I didnt see that either. Lastly in the last page of their submission they show various sites that they attempted to look out, i presume, but they provide very Little Information there. The code says something about good faith efforts. When so many puts on the table that there was no interest. I have no idea whether that is a good faith effort, or not. I need to see these things before i make a final decision. I would be happy to respond. My understanding, the first item you brought up was our compliance with the Design Guidelines and preservation review. Did i understand that correctly . Historical review. I can respond to that. This is not within the webster street historic district. It is immediately adjacent to the district which was established in 1981. This property was not included. It is a category d building for our preservation standards. Included in the report is a ceqa exemption which is
Your book we are going to cover a lot of ground beef eating inside of communist china is thrived for global supremacy. First of all, why did you decide to write a book . Guest this is my eighth book ended 2000, i wrote a book called the china threat and it was amazing in that it predicted the emergence of a major threat posed by communist china. Ever since i wrote the book i tried to do another book and every publisher that i approached sadly well not write a single topic that you can have chapters. But we wont have a single topic. Host why was that . Guest i really dont know. It was their interest or concern about whether they would sell. Finally i dug into it and i said its time to do another book on the threat from china as it is becoming greater than it was way back when it was published. Host your book is very timely. Let me ask you about this title. Its defeating the sky then you go into the global supremacy. The second half is very clear and understandable. What is this and wher
Is usually included by, excuse me by the permit holder. I didnt see that either. Lastly in the last page of their submission they show various sites that they attempted to look out, i presume, but they provide very Little Information there. The code says something about good faith efforts. When so many puts on the table that there was no interest. I have no idea whether that is a good faith effort, or not. I need to see these things before i make a final decision. I would be happy to respond. My understanding, the first item you brought up was our compliance with the Design Guidelines and preservation review. Did i understand that correctly . Historical review. I can respond to that. This is not within the webster street historic district. It is immediately adjacent to the district which was established in 1981. This property was not included. It is a category d building for our preservation standards. Included in the report is a ceqa exemption which is signed by our Historic Preservat