present in the capitol complex and vicinity on january 6th. i m not surehe there were not undercover agents at this point. you don t know s whether there were an undercover federal agents, fbi agents in the crowd or in the capitol on january 6th. i say that because i want to bel very careful. assets presenty as that day? that s a place where, again,, i want to be careful agentsagens versus assets. and we know that the feds areg o never going to let up on howp on angry parents attending school board meetings or how what a danger they are. , whthey re basically the equivalent of al qaedaally. domestically. fbi opened 25 assessments against parent thed 25s and en created a new threat tag director. it didn t attorney general g garland, to consult with you or the fbi before issuing thaarlat i can t get into discussions, threats of violenco discuse. i that s a different matter. we re going to work with.
history. this is the most irresponsibleen and dangerous decision by a prosecutor in the history ofacti the country. the hihe s opened up pandora s x against the presidency itself. hunter biden and joe biden jo could be prosecuted under this theory.n can be p if they re on vacation in south carolina and made a call to china presiden this is a danger to the presidency. this is turning the rule of law upside down to destroy a man,too donald trump, who the left w fears. do not let them get awayshow with this vote . showp at up at the ballot box.bo donald trump, .com, give the mao some money so he can fight.e ca yes. thant k you, lindsey graham. we really appreciate it. , thank you. u all right. joining us now, former chairman of the house intelligencetellige committee, devin nunes, and foxr news contributor jason chaffetz. ior devin, this is not your firt rodeo. we went through the muehler artch hunt together. we went through fisa pfize applications together.
they have now come out of this and fundamentally failed to prove their case. was there a quid pro quo? this will be the first impeachment that has ever had with honestly disputed not justth disputed facts and why ty want to impeach the president, but actually contradicted facts. laura: republicans are unified and later on i m going to share hilarious sound that happened on the other cables earlier today. they are melting down about howp unified the republicans are. it s a choice. you don t want to miss it. meanwhile, report after reportd that the democrats are struggling over whether to expand the articles of impeachment. it s like a piece of silly putty when you push it down on the comics and you could stretch it and make it look like whatever you want. this is worthy of note. democrats uncertainty has some legacy media members literally up in arms. the entire republican party is united around one message right now, protecting the president be up at the democratic party is no
zelenskyth in kyiv where presidt zelensky asked about the security assistance. although bothta senators addresd strong bipartisan congressional support for ukraine senator johnson cautioned president zelensky that president trump has a negative view of ukraine and that president zelensky would havesk a difficult time overcoming it. senator johnson further explained that he had been, quote, shocked by president trump s negative reaction during an oval office meeting on may 23rd when he and the three amigos proposed that president trump meet president zelensky and showp support for ukraine. on september 8th ambassador taylor told me zoets now they re insisting zelensky commit to the investigation in an interview with cnn which i took to refer to the threete amigos. i was shocked the requirement was so specific and concrete. we advised our ukrainian counterparts to voice a commitment to following the rule of law and generally investigating corruption allegations, this was a demand
back. he joins us right now with more. happy to have you on this morning. you didn t agree with the louisville mayor. there s nothing more the rank hypocrisy of the left never cease to amaze me. calling for senator mcconnell to address death while stand standing outside his home calling for his death, you are kind enough to play more of the scrubbable portions of the video. people live stabbing themselves calling for stabbing himself in the heart with a variety of adjectives thrown in there as well. this is not free speech. this is terroristic threatening. and for the mayor to and the there with that is hypocrisy. what should happen in cases like this. you referenced the first amendment, freedom of speech. some say they re not inflicting harm on anyone so they consider it peaceful protesting. your opinion, what should happen when individuals like this showp at someone s home, stay things