ale, i promise you, because i haven t felt so well today. i so it s ginger ale. delicious ginger ale. sean, listen u, i m telling you, i feel i have to tell you,el li i feel a little bit bad tonight because what is america going to do? t the most scintillating 30 seconds of tv everyg 30 nigh with you and me? i don t know how they re the argoing to.ay let me just say this. laura and i a plan we have we discusseved and you will learnt more about it in the weeks to come. this is not the we ve weeks toen each other for 30 years and this will not be ther to same the last time we rege i on the air together. i ll put it that way. you bet. i can t wait. and it s been a pleasure. i ll be here. we ll see everybody at seven. all right. thanks so much, michelle. congrats on youri can new time and i ll look forward to seeing you soon. all right, sean? take care. thank you. and i am laura ingraham. carethank lauranighham. washington tonight with some breaking news. bide president
is there any evidence that you providedanha to attorney general garland that supported that predicateey gener, that pr, that there was an increase in harassment and threats of th. ssment and threats of i m not aware of any such evidence. and while we r e on the subjects it ,how is it possible that with cameras on just about every street corner near the the capitol, the fbi still hasn t made any progressitol onh planted those pipe bombs on january 6th? canospipe tell us how the se pipe bomb was found at the dnc. bo again, i m not going to get into that here. 800 days agohere. is when thisha happened and you said you had total confidence we d apprehend the subjecconfident. we have conducted all logical investigative steps and interviewe all logd all log. individuals at this venue. and it s 900. neeyou need to tell us whatre you found because we re finding stuff you haven t released into. the public. now, did they run into dead o ends at the fbi or did they stop when the answers p
. .orney generalnd i m just a recovering attorney. but this is obviously going to end attor back up at the supreme court. i mean, you can read it as much suprn. you can read it as much the court likes to sort of s. so they re going to push this to the. they re going to push this to ia legal challenge and then, you know, appeal it up the chain till it getsen, t back to the supreme court. but two members of the equalo ployme employment opportunity commission of president biden published a piecntty ident bie, bloomberge that law, and they wrote that those calling for an end to dtie or an end efforts due to the court s decision are wrong. employers caton and should maintain their commitment to advancing m the eei principls in their workplaces. they re notr this go, mr. attorney general. no way, no how. o there are a lot of people deeply invested in that. bu t he has very broad meanings, very different meanings. and i think the concern here m is about explicitleay treating people di
present in the capitol complex and vicinity on january 6th. i m not surehe there were not undercover agents at this point. you don t know s whether there were an undercover federal agents, fbi agents in the crowd or in the capitol on january 6th. i say that because i want to bel very careful. assets presenty as that day? that s a place where, again,, i want to be careful agentsagens versus assets. and we know that the feds areg o never going to let up on howp on angry parents attending school board meetings or how what a danger they are. , whthey re basically the equivalent of al qaedaally. domestically. fbi opened 25 assessments against parent thed 25s and en created a new threat tag director. it didn t attorney general g garland, to consult with you or the fbi before issuing thaarlat i can t get into discussions, threats of violenco discuse. i that s a different matter. we re going to work with.