ale, i promise you, because i haven t felt so well today. i so it s ginger ale. delicious ginger ale. sean, listen u, i m telling you, i feel i have to tell you,el li i feel a little bit bad tonight because what is america going to do? t the most scintillating 30 seconds of tv everyg 30 nigh with you and me? i don t know how they re the argoing to.ay let me just say this. laura and i a plan we have we discusseved and you will learnt more about it in the weeks to come. this is not the we ve weeks toen each other for 30 years and this will not be ther to same the last time we rege i on the air together. i ll put it that way. you bet. i can t wait. and it s been a pleasure. i ll be here. we ll see everybody at seven. all right. thanks so much, michelle. congrats on youri can new time and i ll look forward to seeing you soon. all right, sean? take care. thank you. and i am laura ingraham. carethank lauranighham. washington tonight with some breaking news. bide president
ordered 3000 reserve to be b ready for european deployments with politico. nothing saying that. this doesn t suggestsn t s our military training mission in europe is going to change mideurope is going to change men of several new brigades after the ukraine invasion , this has stretched active duty forces. what s more alarmin g is that, according to sources, th that, according to sources, are from something called the individual ready reserves. those are not active reservists, which speaks to how a depletede guard our military has become under biden. we re going to have more on thisn.we ll a moment. but first, a convenient coldc cases. that s the focus ofus tonight s angle. now, when they think an investigation is going to helpla democrats politically, the fbi is johnnll fy on the spot. their commitment to the rule of law and to pursuinw ang justice is boundless. the scope and scale of this
this adds up. it s pretty obvious at this it s pretty obvious at this these inconvenient truths untitl they re forced by a court order to reveal them. your fbi wrote a memoheing talking about radical, traditional catholics. let me jusdicat read from page 4 four. provide new opportunities to mitigate extremist threat through outreach to traditional ghs. gh outreach to traditional the development of sources with the placement and access to report on places of worship.p that s what this memorandum said. and you won t let us talk to the people who did it. in response to that, i didn t know i was waiting fo . the question. and you can assure us that this didn t happen. that product assure did not to,s we can as best as we can tell, result in any investigative as aa result of it. doesn t answer the question of doj . now, imagine if trump s doj drew up plans to go after some cherishedo af left wing gre like the southern poverty law center. now, the catholics aren t the threat. a weaponi
is there any evidence that you providedanha to attorney general garland that supported that predicateey gener, that pr, that there was an increase in harassment and threats of th. ssment and threats of i m not aware of any such evidence. and while we r e on the subjects it ,how is it possible that with cameras on just about every street corner near the the capitol, the fbi still hasn t made any progressitol onh planted those pipe bombs on january 6th? canospipe tell us how the se pipe bomb was found at the dnc. bo again, i m not going to get into that here. 800 days agohere. is when thisha happened and you said you had total confidence we d apprehend the subjecconfident. we have conducted all logical investigative steps and interviewe all logd all log. individuals at this venue. and it s 900. neeyou need to tell us whatre you found because we re finding stuff you haven t released into. the public. now, did they run into dead o ends at the fbi or did they stop when the answers p
they then subsequently did through falsified fisa applications. bu subseqt you know, this issue abt eric swalwell, i will say this because he s repeatedly comewild since this time and said, you know, the fbi cleared me of d mewrongdoing and was wrong foa for kevin mccarthy to remove him from the intelligence committee. o removeknow what he s not sayin he s not saying that his actions didn t hart m actio national security. so, liste n, stupidity is not a crime, but it doesn t mean that it doesn t our nationaldoe security. so if you are duped or playet hd or used by a foreign se used by a foreign sensitive national security information, even if it s unwittingly that can harmdt our national security. and it s a reason whyintell you shouldn t be serving on a congressional intelligence committee. and it s part of the basis and r which kevin mccarthy moved to appropriately remove him ap, that committee.ntve him john, i want to just circlerc back to what we were talking about earliele tr