subpostmaster is is not a reasonable thing to disclose? ii subpostmaster is is not a reasonable thing to disclose? thing to disclose? if there was issues there thing to disclose? if there was issues there than thing to disclose? if there was issues there than the - thing to disclose? if there was issues there than the lawyersl thing to disclose? if there was i issues there than the lawyers knew about it they should disclose it. but you know about it. the lawyers. as i said, but you know about it. the lawyers. as i said. i but you know about it. the lawyers. as i said, i expect but you know about it. the lawyers. as i said, i expect the but you know about it. the lawyers. as i said, i expect the lawyers i but you know about it. the lawyers. as i said, i expect the lawyers to i as i said, i expect the lawyers to do it, not me. i had disclosed all relevant work i had pertaining to the case and the lawyers should deal with the defence lawyers. flan the case and the lawyers shoul
place because front and centre for their defence is the horizon system and the reliability of the horizon system. in what sense are we to understand that mr smith has any idea whether obtaining data for that period would have or would not have assisted or undermined at the crowds case? m assisted or undermined at the crowds case? ~ ~ assisted or undermined at the crowds case? ~ ~ ,, , ., case? i think mr smith is going, based on the case? i think mr smith is going, based on the question case? i think mr smith is going, based on the question that - case? i think mr smith is going, based on the question that the l based on the question that the postmaster at the time was at balance each and every week and each and every month sol balance each and every week and each and every month so i think that mr smith has made the decision where that, you know, there was no issues showing, no data would show any loss. ., ., , ., showing, no data would show any loss. ., ., ~ ., . loss. how would
know. ~ , ., them as lawyers to let other people know. ~ , :, :, them as lawyers to let other people know. ~ , ., ., , know. when you are signing the disclosure know. when you are signing the disclosure statements - know. when you are signing the disclosure statements of - know. when you are signing the i disclosure statements of schedule of a news material, schedule of use material, schedule a sensitive material, schedule a sensitive material, did you cast your mind to that issue as to whether there was information that didn t appear on your schedule but that was held in relation to another case? absolutely dead. relation to another case? absolutely dead- matt relation to another case? absolutely dead. matt can t relation to another case? absolutely dead. matt can t say relation to another case? absolutely dead. matt can t say i relation to another case? absolutely dead. matt can t say i did. - relation to another case? absolutely dead. matt can t say i did. if
forms for the committee for the committal- forms for the committee for the committal. , ., ., , committal. yes, so that as a test that is being committal. yes, so that as a test that is being repeated committal. yes, so that as a test that is being repeated to - committal. yes, so that as a test that is being repeated to you i committal. yes, so that as a test that is being repeated to you by. committal. yes, so that as a test i that is being repeated to you by the head of the criminal law team. do you still say that it was the responsibility of cartwright king to ensure appropriate disclosure are not your responsibility. cartwright kina , not your responsibility. cartwright kin: , if not your responsibility. cartwright king. if you not your responsibility. cartwright king. if you are not your responsibility. cartwright king, if you are talking not your responsibility. cartwright king, if you are talking about i not your responsibility. cartwright king, if you are talking ab
true, doesn t it? that s not true. i never said to her that she - true, doesn t it? that s not true. i never said to her that she was i true, doesn t it? that s not true. i never said to her that she was the only one. never said to her that she was the onl one. :. . never said to her that she was the onl one. ., , ,, ., only one. that s consistent with not raising seema only one. that s consistent with not raising seema misra s only one. that s consistent with not raising seema misra s case. - only one. that s consistent with not raising seema misra s case. in i only one. that s consistent with not raising seema misra s case. in the i raising seema misra s case. in the context of the raising seema misra s case. in the context of the interview raising seema misra s case. in the context of the interview at - raising seema misra s case. in the context of the interview at the i raising seema misra s case. in the. context of the interview at the time i have not said to jacqueline