they told the international court ofjustice in the hague, that the three months of bombardment violated the genocide convention of 191i8. south africa also alleges, that israel had a genocidal intent against palestinians in gaza, nurtured at the highest level of state. israel has dismissed the case as atrocious and baseless. its lawyers will begin their response on friday. south africa is calling for an immediate halt to the israeli military operation. in court, lawyers outlined the case against israel. the material confirms the rights and issues and their violation. that israel has committed and is committing acts capable of being characterised as genocidal. you have heard from ms hassim about direct extermination of thousands of people and children of the palestinian population in gaza since the 7th of october last year. and south africa and the world together stand witness to the forced evacuation of over 85% of the population of gaza from their homes. and the herding of t
i had little input into that inquiry. i was there on the day of the interview but any pre or post work would have been by the person in charge of the inquiry. i5 person in charge of the inquiry. is a you had nothing to do with endorsing the content of the report? no. , ., endorsing the content of the report? no. , . , ., , no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was shocked no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was shocked when - no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was shocked when janet . that she was shocked when janet skinner was charged with theft. where you? this skinner was charged with theft. where you? skinner was charged with theft. where ou? a , where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who sourced where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who sourced it. where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who sourced it. i - where you
about their experience of what it was like to be investigated by them. for example, we have heard from a woman who has talked about threatening calls from him and who has in fact been at the inquiry today listening to the man who interrogated her. she was not one of the people to be convicted, but she was accused of. forced to pay back a shortfall of thousands of pounds. that had a devastating effect on her life. it s not just been it s notjust been about the horizon it system, it s also been about his behaviour, his behaviour in the investigating team. behaviour, his behaviour in the investigating team. among the sub- postmaster investigating team. among the sub- postmaster is investigating team. among the sub-postmaster is wrongly - investigating team. among the - sub-postmaster is wrongly prosecuted sub postmaster is wrongly prosecuted is hasmur shingadia, his post office was used by the princess of wales when she was growing up nearby and even got an invite to her we
means before day ten. i have no knowledge as to whether this occurred in this case or not. this confirms that there were indeed communications issues between horizon and the data centre at this time. however, it should have had no impact on data recorded locally within the branch, provided all operational processes are followed correctly. all historical data should have been sent back to the branch from the data centre as normal. i have not had the opportunity to examine the detailed logs from the period to see whether there were any issues or any justification in the claim that this resulted in a apparent system losses of £3000, as claimed. those final words in that final sentence, i have not had the opportunity to examine the detailed logs, do you consider that to be a fair and accurate summary of the position we have seen in those e mails? it accurate summary of the position we have seen in those e-mails?- have seen in those e-mails? it looks that wa , have seen in thos
System . Obviously, she knew that i had the west byfleet case and we would have just dealt with our own cases, really. I dont think that would have been much cross about where you work with your case, so to speak. But, yes, from this e mail, you can see that the Expert Witness bubbly was going to be needed, but you tended to just focus on your own case and you would not really have time or get into too much detail discussing other cases with other investigators. Flan discussing other cases with other investigators discussing other cases with other investigators. Discussing other cases with other investiuators. ,. ,. , investigators. Can we please look at oll investigators. Can we please look at poll 00167138. Investigators. Can we please look at poll 00167138, please . Investigators. Can we please look at poll 00167138, please . Around investigators. Can we please look at poll 00167138, please . Around the | poll 00167138, please . Around the similar time a few days later, if we could