fishing expedition isjust throwing anything around to see what comes out from it. we have seen a number of request for disclosure, did you seek and obtain the information that was sought. either by sarah porter or from either by sarah porter orfrom our prosecution agency can t write king didn t do it if they had asked me for anything i would have. you would have for anything i would have. you would have done for anything i would have. you would have done whatever they requested? we spoke earlier about the reliance of legal teams to cross disclose from other cases. here we have cartwright king, an external firm perhaps the lawyers for the case and you also have sarah porter who is potentially yet another external firm. external firm. cartwright king became the
subpostmaster is is not a reasonable thing to disclose? ii subpostmaster is is not a reasonable thing to disclose? thing to disclose? if there was issues there thing to disclose? if there was issues there than thing to disclose? if there was issues there than the - thing to disclose? if there was issues there than the lawyersl thing to disclose? if there was i issues there than the lawyers knew about it they should disclose it. but you know about it. the lawyers. as i said, but you know about it. the lawyers. as i said. i but you know about it. the lawyers. as i said, i expect but you know about it. the lawyers. as i said, i expect the but you know about it. the lawyers. as i said, i expect the lawyers i but you know about it. the lawyers. as i said, i expect the lawyers to i as i said, i expect the lawyers to do it, not me. i had disclosed all relevant work i had pertaining to the case and the lawyers should deal with the defence lawyers. flan the case and the lawyers shoul
over the page, we have a number of disclosure requests that were made ijy disclosure requests that were made by the defence in khayyam ishaq s case. if we can scroll down a little more. we can see here the request of materials and all knowledge of the prosecution in existence whether in the hands of the prosecution of third parties that reasonably supports or is reasonably capable of supporting the contention that the post office horizon s hardware system has proved to be unreliable or inaccurate or the susceptible to man function or otherwise to the production of erroneous results. the results were the provision of final or internal and external investigation and require of reviews whether instigated by the post or another body
ishaq s because i wouldn t have dealt directly with any defence solicitors. ~ ., ., , ., ~ dealt directly with any defence solicitors. ~ ., ., ~ solicitors. who do you think was responsible solicitors. who do you think was responsible for solicitors. who do you think was responsible for disclosure? i solicitors. who do you think was responsible for disclosure? our| responsible for disclosure? our la ers responsible for disclosure? our lawyers in responsible for disclosure? oi“ lawyers in behalf of the responsible for disclosure? iii “ lawyers in behalf of the post office. ~ ., ., ,, ~ lawyers in behalf of the post office. ~ ., ., ~ office. what do you think your duties were office. what do you think your duties were in office. what do you think your duties were in relation - office. what do you think your duties were in relation to i duties were in relation to disclosure? to duties were in relation to disclosure? duties were in relation to disclosure? ., ,, ., ., dis