loads of similar schemes, key differences but with the same aim. it is happening a lot of already, as you probably know. the idea is, breathe. some people say lights versus livelihoods, soaring cost of living, soaring number of health problems from pollution. some people say it is set versus livelihoods. a dichotomy is shaping politics. some of the arguments are on the working classes, take london, sw19, leafy london, less of a problem than in e14, less leafy tower hamlets. the question, is ulez for you? tower hamlets. the question, is ulez foryou? sw19, tower hamlets. the question, is ulez for you? sw19, leafy wimbledon. here is the news from nick hatfield. good morning. the high court is to hear arguments for and against the expansion of london s ultra low emission zone. five conservative led councils are challenging the move by mayor sadiq khan, who says it s needed to tackle air pollution. financial regulators will demand to know why banks aren t passing on highe
roach. we had sam, linda and edward, oliver, we will speak to roach. we had sam, linda and edward, oliver, we will speak to doctor- roach. we had sam, linda and edward, oliver, we will speak to doctorjim - oliver, we will speak to doctorjim mcouaid, and air pollution scientist at the university of leeds, but first a text, i can t believe a midwife is against this, children s lungs. you can answer that in a second, sam. hello, jim. we have got jim. we also have the transport lead the surrey county council, matt furniss, one of the council to brought thisjudicial furniss, one of the council to brought this judicial review. matt furniss, conservative counsellor. how are you doing? why are you doing this? to how are you doing? why are you doing this? ., , ,, , , , ., this? to help surrey residents who will be impacted this? to help surrey residents who will be impacted both this? to help surrey residents who will be impacted both socially - this? to help surrey residents who will be
mitigation has been offered outside of london and at the end of the day we fully support. surrey county council is investing over 50 million, we are putting more cycling and walking routes available, more electric vehicle charge points and a half price fairfor under electric vehicle charge points and a half price fair for under 20s. we are really for public transport but the problem is the whole mitigation is solely london focused on the charges will all be out of london. so with this court case, because the mayor of london and tfl refused to engage right up until we did the court case, which is really disappointing, we are saying think about outside of london, those are the residency will be and they should get a fair share of any mitigation proposed. those are the residents who will be affected and they should get a fair share. you are saying this has not been done the right way. jemima