loads of similar schemes, key differences but with the same aim. it is happening a lot of already, as you probably know. the idea is, breathe. some people say lights versus livelihoods, soaring cost of living, soaring number of health problems from pollution. some people say it is set versus livelihoods. a dichotomy is shaping politics. some of the arguments are on the working classes, take london, sw19, leafy london, less of a problem than in e14, less leafy tower hamlets. the question, is ulez for you? tower hamlets. the question, is ulez foryou? sw19, tower hamlets. the question, is ulez for you? sw19, leafy wimbledon. here is the news from nick hatfield. good morning. the high court is to hear arguments for and against the expansion of london s ultra low emission zone. five conservative led councils are challenging the move by mayor sadiq khan, who says it s needed to tackle air pollution. financial regulators will demand to know why banks aren t passing on highe
roach. we had sam, linda and edward, oliver, we will speak to roach. we had sam, linda and edward, oliver, we will speak to doctor- roach. we had sam, linda and edward, oliver, we will speak to doctorjim - oliver, we will speak to doctorjim mcouaid, and air pollution scientist at the university of leeds, but first a text, i can t believe a midwife is against this, children s lungs. you can answer that in a second, sam. hello, jim. we have got jim. we also have the transport lead the surrey county council, matt furniss, one of the council to brought thisjudicial furniss, one of the council to brought this judicial review. matt furniss, conservative counsellor. how are you doing? why are you doing this? to how are you doing? why are you doing this? ., , ,, , , , ., this? to help surrey residents who will be impacted this? to help surrey residents who will be impacted both this? to help surrey residents who will be impacted both socially - this? to help surrey residents who will be
world studies in london and across the world that studies in london and across the world that have highlighted really clearly world that have highlighted really clearly that our pollution at the level clearly that our pollution at the level we clearly that our pollution at the level we have in london from cars is killing level we have in london from cars is killing thousands of people a year. this is killing thousands of people a year. this is a killing thousands of people a year. this is a public health crisis. i really this is a public health crisis. i really feel this is a public health crisis. i really feel that the argument of saying really feel that the argument of saying we are looking but we have only ever saying we are looking but we have only ever had one person die of air pollution only ever had one person die of air pollution is only ever had one person die of air pollution is irresponsibly misleading. we pollution is irresponsibly misleading. pollu