be continuity with the white house. let s just remember, sally yates earlier in her career was equally criticized by democrats. this is someone who has been criticized now on both sides for being a partisan. juliet, you wrote a fascinating op ed about the big take aways from the hearing yesterday about what former dni james clapper said. here is how the president sees it. he tweeted director clapper reiterated what everybody including the fake media already knows. there is no evidence of collusion with russia and trump. that s not exactly what we heard from clapper, is it? it is so inaccurate. it is like watching, you know, 180 degree mirror about what s going on. this is exactly what jim clapper said and it was sleeper testimony. clapper for some time has been invoked by trump and his surrogates to say, well, jim clapper said that he never saw evidence of collusion. therefore, no collusion. what was amazing about the
times and then we never saw evidence of that. and then it was changed to incidental collections, intelligence swept up when spying on foreign agents and we never saw evidence and the nunes stuff came out and they said that vindicated donald trump and it didn t. but as long as people start asking about other things in the news cycle, they kind of put it to rest. vivian, because deadline journalists are good at this, because we had your former colleague on last night and asked him for a headline. on the fly, if i asked you to write what journalists affectionately call a thought piece on what you ve witnessed 76 days in so far, what would your lead sentence be or best attempt? never a dull moment. hands down. lead sentence and paragraph. thanks to all of our friends. thanks to the three of you for joining us. again, appreciate you coming on the broadcast.
he eludes he has something and then we don t really see it. this happened with the wire tapping claim. he said barack obama wire tapped him in quotes and we never saw evidence of that and then it was changed to incidental collections, intelligence swept up when spying on foreign agents and we never saw evidence and the nunes stuff came out and they said that vindicated donald trump and it didn t. but as long as people start asking about other things in the news cycle, they fute rest. vivian, because deadline journalists are good at this, because we had your former colleague on last night and asked him for a headline. on the fly, if i asked you to write what journalists affectionately call a thought piece on whut you ve witnessed 76 days in so far, what would your lead sentence be or best attempt? never a dull moment.
thousands of e. makes they never saw evidence of intent to miss handle classified information, they they put out changes the underlying reel reasoning which is why this is more about process than substance. having said all that, the bottom line if you believe james comey is that he came to work yesterday and someone put this on his desk and said here s what we found, do we want to look at it? investigators generally, you were talking about this earlier, the way white water turns into other issues, whether this is good or bad, investigators want to look at all of it rather than closing their eyes to things even when a case is closed. the other key question, chris, and as a keen observer of politics, you already noticed it. this letter is not very clarifying. that s why governor mike pence said he wants the same thing john podesta wants and hillary clinton wants. they want more information. why? the letter isn t very clarifying, what i what we have
he lost his shield. he lost his gun. when you violate new york city department policy, that is what happens to you. you re not prosecuted. now, the prosecutor in staten island took it a step further because the medical examiner said it was a homicide. the man died in a violent confrontation. so the grand jury sits as many as 25, it s far more than ferguson. you got to get 12 grand jurors in new york state to say, yes, there should be an indictment. they said no. i m with you that i saw what happened and it was very troubling. i don t think the police officer meant to kill mr. garner. i don t think he went in with that. he meant to stop him from resisting arrest. are you with me so far? do you agree so far? i disagree in the sense that the grand jury saw evidence. i don t know what they saw in addition to what we saw. but there is no way, bill, you