he lost his gun. when you violate new york city department policy, that is what happens to you. you re not prosecuted. now, the prosecutor in staten island took it a step further because the medical examiner said it was a homicide. the man died in a violent confrontation. so the grand jury sits as many as 25, it s far more than ferguson. you got to get 12 grand jurors in new york state to say, yes, there should be an indictment. they said no. i m with you that i saw what happened and it was very troubling. i don t think the police officer meant to kill mr. garner. i don t think he went in with that. he meant to stop him from resisting arrest. are you with me so far? do you agree so far? i disagree in the sense that the grand jury saw evidence. i don t know what they saw in addition to what we saw. but there is no way, bill, you
grand jury? well, first of all, i think it s a tragic event. i think the grand jury saw evidence that obviously you did not see and they heard testimony we did not hear. i think there are two important points to focus on that jeff just talked about. one of which is the crime itself. i know there s a lot of people out there that would say as jeff did, this was a very minor crime. the problem is the police officer, when he s effecting an arrest, he doesn t have the ability to say this is a minor crime so i m going to arrest in a different way. i m going to do something differently. once that police officer says your under arrest, you re obligated to comply with that arrest and obviously mr. gardner based on the tape did not
in colorado. they re not they re supposed to try their case in a court of law, not in the court of public opinion. we do know, however, and obviously there have been a lot of questions from the media on both sides, that the arapahoe county d.a., carol chambers, is expected to speak ten minutes after the hearing. it is unlikely, given the seriousness of this case, and what the judge just had to say, that she ll have any expanse f remarks, but it will be interesting, at least to get her perspective on what happened, including a court appearance again on the 30th, monday. that s right. and on the 30th, he should be formally advised of the many charges against him. right. go ahead, craig? i think we all saw evidence in this courtroom, the reactions of the defendant holmes were in touch with reality. as you said, his eyes were cast down, he seemed to be somber, reflective, even sad about what
trump-russia inquiry when the only ones who excluded with the russians was your girlfriend hillary and the cfius committee with the safe our uranium to russia and a payback to hillary. there were investigations and you were removed when the new fbi director saw evidence of your activities. while you threaten jim comey and threatened if you go down, everyone else will, jim comey writes a conciliatory tweet and says you served with distinction. he s clearly hoping you won t testify against him. this is a classic crime family takedown. who is going to rat on whom. if this were the movie the
trump-russia inquiry when the only ones who excluded with the russians was your girlfriend hillary and the cfius committee with the safe our uranium to russia and a payback to hillary. there were investigations and you were removed when the new fbi director saw evidence of your activities. while you threaten jim comey and threatened if you go down, everyone else will, jim comey writes a conciliatory tweet and says you served with distinction. he s clearly hoping you won t testify against him. this is a classic crime family takedown. who is going to rat on whom. if this were the movie the