Front row we need to keep that clear for the fire marshalls. The board president is joined by your commissioner lazarus commissioner lazarus and commissioner hurtado Pr Commission darryl will be absent and to my left is the deputy hell provide the board with legal advice. Im cindy that grolg gold at the scene were represented by the cases with the representing the Planning Department and planning commission. Well be joined by hanson tom with the building of inspection and norman wong with the San Francisco Transportation Agency division of sustainable streets. Typed im sorry we have the transportation of Taxi Services please go over the boards guidelines. The board requests you turn off outline pagers and cell phones. Please carry on conversations implicit the halfway. Appellant and Department Representatives each have 7 minutes to present their cases and 3 minutes for rebuttal. Party must conclude their comments within the 7 minutes and those who are not affiliated with the cases get
The same period of time that obag is providing. The department of public works working with other City Department is committed to complete streets. We feel it vital to make the investment. We need to spend even more money just on repaving. The amount of money that we need to meet those commitments is included in the masonic project and broadway project. To meet that commitment, we will need all of them. We will be working with the t. A. Staff and especially with the other agencies applied for obag funds in order to make sure were meeting all of those needs. Thanks. Thank you. Right now were over subscribed. What we will actually heard a lot of concerns that youve spoken about today. We are going to look at each the projects. Get better refined cost estimates. Look to see if there are other sources to still keep us on schedule that deliver the projects that we committed. And move forward on this entire package of projects. I think were going to try to do that in the next couple months a
Enterprise goal of 5 percent and an aspirational Small Business goal of 25 percent. And at the moment, the contractor is not meeting either goal. Although they are very close to meeting the disadvantaged Business Enterprise goal. This is a focus of attention for both cal trans, and the Transportation Authority where we are carefully and closely monitoring the out reach and the hiring practices as well as the subcontracting practices. And we have assurances repeated assurances from the contractor that they will meet those goals prior to the completing of construction. Workforce development program, is going very well, comparedly speaking, the contractor committed at the beginning that at least, 50 percent of new hires would be referred through the city build program and they are on track for meeting that goal. And 72, openings have been reported to city build and city build was able to provide candidates for 60 of those 72 to date and 24 have been hired and there are additional candidat
Indication about the developer will be responsible for all project funding and altogether, the port is required to pay, and to decide for that appraiser, and the increment and costs of putting that public, and parking garage, in the project. An, allocation and that is allocated to the parking garage and it is sticking out from the housing and of course, the cost of getting approval from the state and commission, since that is our area. The proposed mlu, very quickly, determines that we are hoping that we are proposing to be included in the mlu. That the belief, or the term for that mlu will be for a period of three years, the three years, is on the rationale that is going to take roughly about a year for the Housing Office to be able to issue the rfp because of the work load in their pipeline that they are dealing with. And a lot of projects at this point. And usually take between two to three years to get entitlement and good for the upper fro ses and so we thought that three years wi
Again. Howard strassner. This kind of shows a Reasonable Committee got together and they came to realize you cant have enough of something that you give away free. So they agreed you give them some more parking, use it for stuff that they need and then you have to pay for parking and the chair and i thought this was enough of a solution many years ago, just have some people get a regular blue sticker and some people get a blue sticker that shows they are really, they dont have the income and they wont have to pay, but i think now hearing this twice, because i went to one of those meetings, that you have to do all of the things that they are recommending plus do something about giving some people a chance to pay less. I dont think you can really do it for less unless you can figure that out. That would be even greater and it would make one but it might have to be free. One comment about the time. If you are mostly charging for the parking, time takes care of itself. I mean, professor sh