Announcements . Please silnchs cell phones and complete speaker card submit today the clerk will appear on the july 19 agenda unless otherwise stated. Todays meeting will not be as excited as yesterday. Item 1 is first daft of Charter Amendment to authorize San Francisco resident who are non citizens to vote for board of education. Thank you. Supervisor mar as i mentioned isnt here today. If we can get a motion to excuse him as well. Okay. Without objection supervisor mar is excused. Since he wont be here and like to continue the item ill call Public Comment unless mr. Lynn would you like to speak . Well go to Public Comment for item 1. Any members who wish to speak come forward. Seeing none. Public comment is closed. Would supervisor mar like 14th or 11th . Well continue item 1 to the july 14th meeting and well take that without objection. Item 2, please. Item 2 is hearing to consider ord nns submitted by 4 or more supervisors to the voters november 8, 2016 election ordinance amending
19 agenda devote to preparing materials unless otherwise stated. And for the commission and attending todays meeting will not be as the commission meetings. That is excited as yesterday. Item 1 is first daft of time and effort that you know, would charter have to be amendment to authorize san redirected from the other francisco resident who are non citizens activities we are doing at this time. The fact that to vote we havent been able to get for board of education. Thank you. Supervisor mar as i that legislation done is not mentioned isnt here today. If we can get a motion to excuse him as reflectivef of our lack of interest in doing well. That t is okay. Without objection a reflection of our overall supervisor mar is excused. Since he wont be workload here and like to continue the item ill and inability to address some of the or the policy issues as we try to call Public Comment unless mr. Lynn deliver would you like to speak . Well go to the 10,000 affordable units at this time. It
Different version they can do it. So, this is unprecedented. It actually illustrates why a watchdog is needed in city hall so that these kinds of shenanigans can no longer happened thank you supervisor campos did i would just say we did adopt all supervisor camposs minutes. The only i would not say the only but the major differences in terms of amendment 101 the public advocate not serve more than two successive terms. Secondly, no person shall be eligible to serve as a public advocate who in the last four years of the office of mayor, member of the board, City Attorney, dist. Atty. , treasure, assessor or public defender and removing the appointment of power of olse director and occ director. So we are actually not trying to prevent or prohibit this measure from getting out to the voters did in fact, it will. I think there are just a few of the differences that we would be able towe would like to see in the measure that would i think give more individuals comfort to support. Mdm. Chai
Ucsf, all that will create more acivity so it is for the good of the patients so we cant do that unless we have access for staff and patients. Thank you so, with that we could propose the amendmentwe could propose the resolution leaving the staff to add the new whereas so move. Thats where that whereas that will help site the added service squz needs well have. Is there is a second to that . Second. Any further discussion following up on commissioner [inaudible] consideration of the Planning Commission, we meet with them annually, can that be added as issue of ours to the annual docket . I know it is a ways away, like 10 months away, but the parking thing is 10 years in the working the meeting that we have joibtly with the Planning Commission is specifically requested by their legislation regards to the Health Care Planning ordinance and i have to ask coleen, do aiosee this may filt or do we want to make this is a different item . The health and Planning Commission meet together for tw
Rebuilt of San Francisco General Hospital if it were subject to helt Care Services mamaster plan isnt only consistent with the master plan have praenl recommended for insentsives and that may be leeway with parking. I look at that and report back to the commission. Would that satisfactory . There should be more collaboration between the 2 departments and we may want to put that within the Planning Session to see how that might be able to be done thats rises from this discussion i also say that with the House Commission and Planning Commission will meet toort on the master plan probably not until 2016. My last question is whether the [inaudible] will include transit dor [inaudible] out to mission bay if there is issues we have in terms of the new ucsf development or any of that [inaudible] we need to put in the resolution good information questions that the director can answer. I dont have that. Or maybe mrs. Joanthere has been question regarding all the transportation issues for missio