Signature did not meet the threshold required by the board of supervisors and the City Ordinance and we probably depending on how things go today well see the ultimate outcome, but we did file the appeal. You did not have enough in the threshold. We did not. The appeals in the past were brought with 20 percent property signatures if thats correct. I think that is correct. I was not involved at the time. If you asked the question, i will give you an answer. The Settlement Agreement that some of the neighbors entered into has taken many of the opponents out. Now, what happened on the settlement it was Large Organizations that knob Hill Association. You will hear from barrett, shes the expert. Its been a very contention manner. There are people concerned about getting involved at this point. The fact that we dont have 20 percent is no indication that one is that the project has been properly analyzed. Of course that issue stands on its own, two, the nature of the contention of the neighbo
Welcome back to the budget and finance committee. My name is supervisor mark farrell. I will be charg this committee. Im joining by supervisor avalos and breed and well be joined by scott wiener and i would like to thank sfgtv committee. Madam clerk, any items. Yes, please submit speaker cards to the clerk. The action will be submitted to the board of supervisors agenda. Supervisor mark farrell please call item no. 1. Item item this is item 140121. This will put more homeless members and provide additional housing for homeless. Our Homeless Outreach is critical to reducing our Homeless Population. Current funding levels facilitates 24 people on the streets. For people sleeping on the streets isnt enough. This will increase the outreach to enhance the team and provide greater levels of service. As we start to dive deeper into our homeless situation in San Francisco. Realize there will be contentious issues and in in supplemental in our early discussions with both inside and outside of c
Clerk. The analysis of the signature did not meet the threshold required by the board of supervisors and the City Ordinance and we probably depending on how things go today well see the ultimate outcome, but we did file the appeal. You did not have enough in the threshold. We did not. The appeals in the past were brought with 20 percent property signatures if thats correct. I think that is correct. I was not involved at the time. If you asked the question, i will give you an answer. The Settlement Agreement that some of the neighbors entered into has taken many of the opponents out. Now, what happened on the settlement it was Large Organizations that knob Hill Association. You will hear from barrett, shes the expert. Its been a very contention manner. There are people concerned about getting involved at this point. The fact that we dont have 20 percent is no indication that one is that the project has been properly analyzed. Of course that issue stands on its own, two, the nature of th
Good morning, everyone with. To the San Francisco Budget Finance Committee for wednesday, march 19, 2014. My name is supervisor mark farrell ill be chairing this committee and joined by supervisor avalos and thank you to clerk linda wong and billing and the other staff. Madam clerk, any announcements . Phones, devices please be advised that the chair may order the removal from the meeting room responsible for the ringing or use of a cell phone, pager, or other similar soundproducing electronic devices. Thank you call item 1. A resolution to modernize and replace 23 or 3 slartsz with 80 and 90 with a extract needing 2 hundred thousand. Okay. Thank you. Good morning chairman and councilmembers im carla im the director at the Mayors Office on disability thank you for the opportunity for talking about this resolution for the emergency contract for the building 80 and 90 elevator project it is near and dear to my heart and were the clients with you were the advocate for the patients and the
Third street and xelsory. The interpretation dated may 1990 in your packet which says when a nonconforming use changes to another use such must conform to other applique able. Lets go to other problems in the eir, the proposed project of uses in the amount of knob hill and increasing parking and traffic large increases in the number of events and patrons that will attending the events. The knob hill does not permit this type of activity. What else is wrong with the eir . In order to avoid the analysis that i just discussed the need to comply with the special use district, the ir, it doesnt meet the plans of 182. The far that allows 2. 51 is exceeded here because the parking garage is not an accessory use as contended by my friend. I say that with great honor. The parking garage is its own use. It operates 24 7, 365, it accommodates the clubs, the hotels and accommodates the masonic. Next is the issue of whether other entertainment can be lawfully applied at the masonic. I pointed out i