Signature did not meet the threshold required by the board of supervisors and the City Ordinance and we probably depending on how things go today well see the ultimate outcome, but we did file the appeal. You did not have enough in the threshold. We did not. The appeals in the past were brought with 20 percent property signatures if thats correct. I think that is correct. I was not involved at the time. If you asked the question, i will give you an answer. The Settlement Agreement that some of the neighbors entered into has taken many of the opponents out. Now, what happened on the settlement it was Large Organizations that knob Hill Association. You will hear from barrett, shes the expert. Its been a very contention manner. There are people concerned about getting involved at this point. The fact that we dont have 20 percent is no indication that one is that the project has been properly analyzed. Of course that issue stands on its own, two, the nature of the contention of the neighbo
Clerk. The analysis of the signature did not meet the threshold required by the board of supervisors and the City Ordinance and we probably depending on how things go today well see the ultimate outcome, but we did file the appeal. You did not have enough in the threshold. We did not. The appeals in the past were brought with 20 percent property signatures if thats correct. I think that is correct. I was not involved at the time. If you asked the question, i will give you an answer. The Settlement Agreement that some of the neighbors entered into has taken many of the opponents out. Now, what happened on the settlement it was Large Organizations that knob Hill Association. You will hear from barrett, shes the expert. Its been a very contention manner. There are people concerned about getting involved at this point. The fact that we dont have 20 percent is no indication that one is that the project has been properly analyzed. Of course that issue stands on its own, two, the nature of th
Third street and xelsory. The interpretation dated may 1990 in your packet which says when a nonconforming use changes to another use such must conform to other applique able. Lets go to other problems in the eir, the proposed project of uses in the amount of knob hill and increasing parking and traffic large increases in the number of events and patrons that will attending the events. The knob hill does not permit this type of activity. What else is wrong with the eir . In order to avoid the analysis that i just discussed the need to comply with the special use district, the ir, it doesnt meet the plans of 182. The far that allows 2. 51 is exceeded here because the parking garage is not an accessory use as contended by my friend. I say that with great honor. The parking garage is its own use. It operates 24 7, 365, it accommodates the clubs, the hotels and accommodates the masonic. Next is the issue of whether other entertainment can be lawfully applied at the masonic. I pointed out i
Given all the appeals over the years. Given that weve had a number of appeals and lawsuit, there are a lot of details that are confusing. We are talking about the mornings modernization of the Masonic Center. Can you tell the number of the proposed project . 135 patrons per show. 3300 from 3100. President david chiu thats my understanding. An increase about 4 percent of capacity for individuals. As i read your appeal letter, it didnt from my perspective didnt address the environmental analysis or the adequacy of that or as much as from 2013 was granted. I wanted to ask why didnt you bring a cu appeal if you spent a lot of time in your letter focused on that. We didnt file a conditional use appeal. The board is very stringent of getting the board before yourself. The reasons we did file a conditional use appeal. It was accepted by the clerk. The analysis of the signature did not meet the threshold required by the board of supervisors and the City Ordinance and we probably depending on h
Signature did not meet the threshold required by the board of supervisors and the City Ordinance and we probably depending on how things go today well see the ultimate outcome, but we did file the appeal. You did not have enough in the threshold. We did not. The appeals in the past were brought with 20 percent property signatures if thats correct. I think that is correct. I was not involved at the time. If you asked the question, i will give you an answer. The Settlement Agreement that some of the neighbors entered into has taken many of the opponents out. Now, what happened on the settlement it was Large Organizations that knob Hill Association. You will hear from barrett, shes the expert. Its been a very contention manner. There are people concerned about getting involved at this point. The fact that we dont have 20 percent is no indication that one is that the project has been properly analyzed. Of course that issue stands on its own, two, the nature of the contention of the neighbo