Maximum outcome. So this lady here with the glasses, and after her well go to the gentleman. Hi im teresa wilmerhutchins, and im at the center for International Student dees studies for maryland. Given all the action in uukraine, what are your directions for u. S. Policy . I have some recommendations. I think we should support ukraine very strongly financially, i think we should support ukraine very strongly militarily. I think the International Community should do both of those things, those of us who know better about the financial problems ukraine faces. So we ought to be their support. We should also defend and beef up the defenses in the nato nations that border russia. So thats an important if were trying to deter the russians from doing what theyve been doing, that is, first invading crimea and then invading the southeastern part of ukraine and we dont want them to do that more, then we need to push back and we need to push back by reinforcing militarily the countries that are i
Country by country. But you can see how the society as a whole is improved when conditions for women improve. And i think that everybodys winners. And one of the things that if when data like this exists it convinces more people that they should, in fact increase standards. And more men get involved the better. So were all for that. And i do think that we are stymied in some areas because we have made political controversy or made partisan really things that are no brainers that such as health care or trying to reduce Maternal Mortality. There are so many things we can agree on, ending violence against women. You have to have more involvement in men. You should not politicize these things. It took us too long to reauthorize the violence against women act here in this country. We know that to have legislation like this helps fight violence against women. And everybody wins. So im hoping that we can through hard core data and knowing more about these issues there will be less partisanshi
When data like this exists it convinces more people that they should, in fact increase standards. And more men get involved the better. So were all for that. And i do think that we are areas because we have m plil controversy or made partisan really things that are no brainers that such as health care or trying to reduce Maternal Mortality. There are so many things we can agree on, ending violence against women. You have to have more involvement in men. You should not politicize these things. It took us too long to reauthorize the violence against women act here in this country. We know that to have legislation like this helps fight violence against women. And everybody wins. So im hoping that we can through hard core data and knowing more about these issues there will be less partisanship and more gains for everyone. More calls. This is milo in iowa. Thanks for joining us. Caller thank you. Yes, maam, i just have a question about are you for rights for all women . You just made a stat
The poor, elderly, and most of our liberal in our society pursed first. At a time when indiana is doing all it can to grow its economy the epa proposal proposed that it will slow our economic progress in raise peoples utility bills. In indiana, we are obviously concerned about the Economic Impact of the proposed rules on business and consumers, but we have also filed that he one pages of technical comments. We want to make sure the rule does not result in unintended consequences such as reduced reliability resulting in ground outs. Or not yet having all the necessary infrastructure in place to convert from coal to natural gas. For purposes of due diligence, indiana is evaluating all available responses to the proposed regulations from submitting estate plan to participating in original approach, or simply refusing to apply at all. However, the fact that this misguided policy will affect hoosiers and other people in this country while actually increasing the worldwide level of the very
Freedom information act, and they do not try to point any exemptions for National Security or classification reasons, it would be an unprecedented event as far as i know. The state department is incredibly aggressive. All agencies of the federal bureaucracy are incredibly aggressive impacting information that could be classified. The notion that the secretary of state, in the course of her duties, could write 55,000 pages or receive 55,000 pages of email and not one ioda of it is classified, would be very difficult for me or for anyone who is somebody with the freedom of information act to believe. I am confident it will be an interesting thing because the state department, as they process request, will have to decide they will look at an email and say, this is classified but if they try to read acted as such, they are making a liar out of the Hillary Clinton defenders. It will be interesting to see how they perceive when they hit that conundrum, but i would be shocked if there is not