september 2020. trump would say that again at another campaign stop just two days later, promising his supporters that the pick to replace justice ruth bader ginsburg on the supreme court would be a woman. and it was a woman. a conservative woman. the nomination of amy coney barrett was rushed through the senate in only 27 days, even though early voting in the presidential election had already begun. but ever since president biden made clear this past week that he would be sticking to his campaign promise to nominate the first african american woman to the supreme court to replace retiring justice stephen breyer, republicans have been falling over one another to act like the democratic president has committed some great crime, broken some great unwritten rule. and it s getting nasty pretty quick. check out senator roger wicker of mississippi. the irony is that the supreme court is at the very same time hearing cases about this sort of
have numerous women on the list. september 2020. trump would say that again at another campaign stop just two days later, promising his supporters that the pick to replace justice ruth bader ginsburg on the supreme court would be a woman. and it was a woman. a conservative woman. the nomination of amy coney barrett was rushed through the senate in only 27 days, even though early voting in the presidential election had already begun. but ever since president biden made clear this past week that he would be sticking to his campaign promise to nominate the first african american woman to the supreme court to replace retiring justice stephen breyer, republicans have been falling over one another to act like the democratic president has committed some great crime, broken some great unwritten rule. and it s getting nasty pretty quick. check out senator roger wicker of mississippi. the irony is that the supreme court is at the very same time hearing cases about this sort of
something you said triggered this in me, that she goes our s-d the circle to find out what she should do, there are two power women in that room. shoo prom previous decades a power person in our industry of media, and ruth bader ginsburg on the supreme court. she goes to ask a man at the new york times what she should do with her interview with ginsberg. yes. it s mind boggling. so if she s the keeper, if katie couric s the keeper of women s issues, please rest that mantel from her hands. it s a great point. flansy pelosi said she s complaining the media is not helping her sell her leftest agenda but maybe she just needs to hire katie couric. tone deaf top official in the biden white house appears to think the current economic anxiety is a quote, high class problem, as americans are hit with the sticker shock at the grocery store, the pump, and just about everywhere they go
it would be - - if katie couric was a real journalist, if she thought that ruth bader ginsburg at the time still sitting on the court didn t understand or didn t really hear what she, uh, was saying, then it was her duty. katie couric s, to let the public know that very thing, given the fact that if she wasn t cogent, she wasn t cogent enough to deal with more complicated and nuanced issues in front of the court that would affect the whole country. katie couric s not a journalist. ruth bader ginsburg clearly was sound and understanding and she was hearing and what she was saying, and in terms of this autobiography, it comes across as a biography that s written by somebody who hates katie couric, quite frankly. so true. my only ex planation for that is here s somebody who star has long faded, who s gasping for relevancy. nailed it. i do think it s interesting,
should be. i mean, i ve always liked katie couric s shows, i think she s a bubbly personality and fun fashion, but i m not looking for her to interpret the english language for me. and to protect people who she admires when she said she was protecting ruth bader ginsburg. you know this emily more than anyone. rbg had an independent streak to her, she criticized roe v. wade despite being pro choice, and here was her streak again. does she really need protecting from katie couric? i think this is absolute y nayser narcissistic of katie couric. in her book she writes about how it s male-dominated industry how she supported and defended quote women whenever she could when she wasn t tearing them down as she said in other chapters. here he she is infantilizing a sitting supreme court justice thinking it takes katie couric to edit ruth bader ginsburg? absolutely not. and it was she who made the determination or the approval of the determination based on a