meeting on friday, let s find out what our families think about the hospital and what they think about this plan. i did a survey of the 26 folks that were there and this is the outcome because i don t know if this helps. of the 26 there, 20 live in the tenderloin, four live along the franklin corridor which is on the other side. and 88% of the respondents that i talked to had either meddical or healthy kids so for me it s disconcerting to see the build of a hospital where 88% might not have access to it. they go to community clinics. when i asked what kind of hospital they d like to see in the neighborhood, most said that hospital that serves needs of children, emergency services and dental services. the other thing is the traffic and contamination issue. before you ve seen a million and one pedestrian reports in the tenderloin. it is one of the most dangerous areas to walk through and the highest density of children so for us it s disconcerting to see we ll have 10,000, 2,00
president miguel: jane martha. good afternoon, commissioners, joseph smith, coalition for health planning, san francisco. breaking down simply that cpmc has four campuses which are basically hospitals with associated services. what cpmc plans to do is phase out the california campus, concentrate outpatient services at their pacific campus and concentrate inpatient services at the new facility at van ness and geary on cathedral hill. the description of st. luke s, however, in the project plan, focuses on a new medical building and a new hospital building that is significantly smaller than the existing hospital. what we see in the d.i.r. is that there is no vision for st. luke s, no anchor. functionally, it reads as though it is an access point for specialty services provided at cathedral hill or pacific campus. st. luke s operated as a full-service hospital primarily providing charity care for well over 100 years until sudder health took over. st. luke s, this takeover happe