Commitment. To bring you gaveltogavel coverage and the house members will be working on two measures to reunify creek korean americans with relatives in north korea. But chair legs before the house of communication from the speaker. The clerk speakers rooms, the washington, d. C. March 9, 2020. I hereby appoint the honorable Jimmy Panetta to act as speaker pro tempore on this day. Signed, nancy pelosi, speaker of the house of representatives. The speaker pro tempore pursuant to the order of the house of january 7, 2020, the chair will now recognize members from lists submitted by the majority leader majority and minority leaders for morning hour debate. The chair will alternate recognition between the parties. With time equally allocated between the parties and each member other than the majority and minority leaders and minority whip limited to five minutes, but in no event shall debate continue beyond 1 50 p. M. The chair recognizes the gentleman from ohio, mr. Gonzalez, for five min
The louisiana law at issue here, act 620, is identical to the texas law and was expressly modeled on it. After a trial, the District Court ruled act 620 unconstitutional, finding no material differences between this case and whole Womans Health. On burdens, it found that act 620 would leave louisiana with just one clinic and one doctor providing abortions. At the same time, it found that act 620 would do nothing for womens health. In reversing the District Courts decision, the fifth circuit committed two fundamental errors. First, it usurped the role of the District Court and disregarded nearly all of its factual findings. Second, the fifth circuit accepted legal arguments that this court rejected four years ago. Nothing, however, has changed that would justify such a legal aboutface. In fact, even more medical organizations have joined the ama and acog to say that admitting privileges impose barriers to abortion with no benefit to patients and that this impact is not state dependent.
Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court, this case is about the respect for the courts precedent, four years ago the court held in holmes help the texas admitting privileges law imposed an undue burden on women seeking abortions. The louisiana law at issue here act 620 is identical to the texas law and was expressly modeled on it. After a trial, the District Court ruled act 620 unconstitutional finding no material differences between this case and hold ems health. On burden it found the act 620 would leave louisiana with just one clinic and one doctor providing abortions. At the same time, it found the act 620 would do nothing for Womens Health. In reversing the District Courts decision, the sixth circuit committed two fundamental errors in my first date used served the role of District Court and disregarded nearly all its factual findings. Second, the abaccepted legal arguments that this court rejected four years ago. Nothing, however, has changed that would justify such a legal
Case 1813 23 june medical services versus russo and the cost petition 1814 60 russo versus june medical services. Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court, this case is about the respect for the courts precedent, four years ago the court held in holmes help the texas admitting privileges law imposed an undue burden on women seeking abortions. The louisiana law at issue here act 620 is identical to the texas law and was expressly modeled on it. After a trial, the District Court ruled act 620 unconstitutional finding no material differences between this case and hold ems health. On burden it found the act 620 would leave louisiana with just one clinic and one doctor providing abortions. At the same time, it found the act 620 would do nothing for Womens Health. In reversing the District Courts decision, the sixth circuit committed two fundamental errors in my first date used served the role of District Court and disregarded nearly all its factual findings. Second, the abaccepted lega
Me. Im sure they will be upset about missing their endoscopys. Of having done the prep without the procedure. Thats what they will be really irritated at. Its all right. They all know. I am keenly aware we you are here. We have about 30 minutes im going to be a facilitator of paul talking. I want to thank you for entitling chapter 2 practice and policy. What that taught me is if you highlight a word. Will know exactly what im talking about. The revolution that john just mentioned, im going to say john, even though its doctor. Was, the only time in recorded history that a slave revolt has led to the founding of a nation. When we heard about the french revolution, and its probably red promises of liberty. How could that be true if there were slaves . How could that be a human rights revolution . The answer is the haitians said it couldnt be true. It wasnt real. No offense to anybody here who is from france. Especially because i really love french food. It could not be meaningful without