Had that effect basically to remove the penthouse and leave the roofdeck not visible from the street. Commissioner sugaya. Im going to make a motion and allowing the roofdeck shall be pulled back the staff can work with the developer and there will be an appropriate stair penthouse structure as minimal as it can be and that also will be set back as far as we can get it from the front of the building. Second. Commissioners there is a motion and a second to take dr to eliminate the penthouse and provide for a minimal stair penthouse to access a roofdeck. Commissioner antonini. Commissioner hillis. Commissioner johnson. Commissioner moore. Commissioner sugaya. Commissioner fong and commissioner president wu. So moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero. And places you on our final calendar i image we also need another motion on the dr and for the may or may not dr. Move to approve the demolition and the construction. Yes. May having i have a second. Thank you. On that
Your website. Part of your responsibility is enforcing the sunshine ordinance and every time the Sunshine Task force refers a complaint you sit here and kib etz and talk about the fact this isnt clear and this isnt clear so when are you going to do something about it . We just did. With all due respect commissioner keane this discussion has been going on for five years, the discussion on who is gets included on the complaint. I did that and i had the task force take that off. The reason is they went through two years of discussion and were the Ethics Commission and according to the sunshine ordinance the only people we can discipline are elected heads and officials and so if you have a complaint against a line employee your response from the staff is we cant do anything, so these things go back and forth and you know. You can say the task force knows what its doing but every single time the task force sends awe recommendation you find or the staff finds a reason to find fault and if yo
The firstround of what were proposing and then it goes to the various other departments within the city. But its in the public way and its public. Its just taking existing actually i have existing photos, if you are interested. Did dog patch neighborhood association, did they raise any questions regarding the shadow cast on esprit park . Not at all. Not at all. Dog patch association actually wrote a letter to the project sponsor. The vote was unanimous in support of the project. And on top of that, they were thrilled that the project didnt go to the height limit. They noted that they saw that the project didnt go to the height limit. And more importantly, they are really enthralled that were doing this beltway, this greenbeltway between the sidewalk and the street. And the capital committee, the inclusionary housing is onsite . The inclusionary housing is onsite. Seeing no other questions, i have been asked to do a roll call vote. Stacy, would you call the roll. Commissioner buell . Ye
Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Supervisor kim id like to forward this with positive recommendation to the full board i apologize we didnt push this forward that will be voted on accepted 2. And a second reading on september 2nd so the motion to support in with recommendation well take that without objection. And madam clerk, any other business before this committee . Theres no further business. Then we are adjourned. Welcome to the San Francisco Historic Preservation meeting for wednesday, august 6th, 2014, the commission does not tolerate any out bursts and silence any mobile device and when speaking before the commission, if you care to state your name for the record and i would like to take roll. Commissioners, first on your agenda, is the general Public Comment, at this time, members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public, that are within the subject matter and jurisdiction of the commission, except for the agenda items your opportunity
To ensure continued resilience. So, that summarizes the actual process that we recommend for going through the Risk Assessment and an adaptation planning for both assets as well as areas within the city. Further, some of the guidelines that are currently being used by project [speaker not understood] in the city what San Francisco planning departments consider flood risk in the ceqa evaluations and flood plane areas are identified in the general plan. The state of california Sea Level Rise guidance document was just updated in march of 2013 and provide similar projections that we have in our guidelines. The California Coastal Commission Just released a draft sea level brie guidance policy document that when we prioritize to land in the coastal zone. In addition, the bay Area Conservation and Development Commission recently updated their bay plan to include guidelines for Risk Assessment for projects that are within the jurisdiction. And then a mentioned before, the National Research Co