Thats the power in what we see happening today when i look at the project like the central subway project i see the section are these and jobs and a transformation of the city accident take place h escape but its a commitment to the Manufacturing Sector our siktsd in the city we have 5 hundred and 40 active manufacturers that has doubt the administrators weve had since sf was launched in the heart of the recession i want to say when we talk about national prongz programs like make america the First Program that baend was the original jobs now i have to give credit to nancy pelosi for her leadership jobs now, if you remember the original version go acted like an intrirm program through that placed individuals who worked chronically underemployed continue to have them in the jobs for at t a year with the sub decided wage to continue that program were not successful but 80 percent of the people placed in the program in the manufacturing seerth were remained by their employer so henship wo
Reason trigger the law as a result their compensations is captured the lobbyist have changed there was a deliberate attempt to cast the net has wide as possible so on outside lobbyist you make one contact with a city official you have to automatically registration as a lobbyist then the issue thats known as obligates that is directed towards the public saying hey please contact our Public Officials to do xyz. That gets to the expertise lobbyist that was addressed its true we dont have a regime for that right now. So whether its thats called for or not if the grand jury thinks to some stent it is that makes sense any other comments from the commissioners on finding recommendation 10 . Finding and recommendation 11 . I also want some clarification on 11. I dont know if the City Attorney actually should talk about the upcoming case id like to know why we think its maybe you want to change that sewer Deputy Director arnold i believe what the staff is proposing in terms of recommendation 11
On what the California Supreme Court decided this could affect other Electronic Communications that isnt about email but to the take the opportunity extending stent an official can use private emails and text and otherwise and claim because its not on the public Communication System s it is automatically not subject to the private act so that question which the District Attorneys Office is advised they shouldnt make the argument but it the definitely a gray area and an ear where the law is developing thats all when a the commissioner is trying to get at. Things will become clarified especially with the new Communication Technologies has it been auditor yet. No, i dont believe so. This is another one where i would like to revisit it once you know so if you could keep us advised when it is argued and decided. Any other questions or comments for the commissioners on 11 i wanted to check in the commissioners and staff and perhaps the public as well were now almost anothers 1 oclock. Were n
Code, that we are either not using frequently, or arent versed with . Were very clear about the internal stairs. Mr. Lindsey, director rahm secretary ionin, commissioner antonini, and all of the commissioners who have been here for the last three, four, five, seven, eight, nine years plus have gone through this internal stair thing many, many times. And we have altered projects or sent them back when that stair was not clearly indicating that indeed an additional unit was being used on its own. And this is basically the issue here. So i would like to go back and have a Zoning Administrator take us one more time through some of the points raised by mr. Vincensi and also be consistent in our attitudes toward internal stairs. I would like to make one more quick clarification, but the idea of the [kph upb ] communicating door. I know that commissioner richards asked about clarification to the dr requesters questions and when the communicating door concept is typically used when you have pe
Interest who are outside of the 150 radius for the 311 notification. They are encouraging the commission to consider an alternative plan design by a neighbor that would reduce the rear massing. The Residential Design Team first reviewed the proposal in march and again after the dr was filed. They determined that there are no exception or extraordinary circumstances to the project that is as presented to the Planning Commission and in this abbreviated format, staffs recommendation to the commission is to not take discretionary review and approve the Building Permit, that concludes my presentation. Thank you. Dr requester, your team has five minutes. Thank you, geek,president wu and members of the Commission Im susan holey and im representing the dr requester. As staff mentioned the request is support by a petition of 59 area residents most of them within the 150 radius and othersust beyond it in the neighborhood, as well as 30 letters from concerned neighbors. I wasnt able to hear all o