intel agencies would be allowing this information and free flow. actually, what do you think? democrats in the past, including al franken, have complained about this 702 rule, that it can easily be misused and abused. there are two issues, we have late-breaking news this afternoon and early this evening that chairman nunes conceded that it may not even be that there were any trump transition members on these interceptions, that is may have even been as little as foreigners discussing the trump transition. martha: just to clarify, he s not sure what it seems to say, could have been phone calls, could have been emails. not sure how many people were grouped into those was the entrance but with god a long way to go on those. that detail is important. that means there were not trump transition people, maybe foreigners discussing the transition, which is a huge difference. this point was made really well in the washington journal today,
against multiculturalism. she said that this idea that london comes together as a city after something like this is not true, that there are such distinct sections of the city where people continue to live within their own culture, that the cultures are not lending. do you agree? it the way that multiculturalism was in fermented in the united kingdom and the 90s is largely responsible for the polarization and self segregation and immobility in britain and across europe. we muslims are disproportionately represented in prisons, underemployed, and we are suffering to progress and get ahead and advance due to some of those policies. as someone who identifies as a liberal, perfectly consistent to speak out against this. let me give you one example. lived in birmingham. one in ten attackers in birmingham, one in ten attackers from across the u.k., purchased five wards in the city of
against multiculturalism. she said that this idea that london comes together as a city after something like this is not true, that there are such distinct sections of the city where people continue to live within their own culture, that the cultures are not lending. do you agree? it the way that multiculturalism was in fermented in the united kingdom and the 90s is largely responsible for the polarization and self segregation and immobility in britain and across europe. we muslims are disproportionately represented in prisons, underemployed, and we are suffering to progress and get ahead and advance due to some of those policies. as someone who identifies as a liberal, perfectly consistent to speak out against this. let me give you one example. lived in birmingham. one in ten attackers in birmingham, one in ten attackers from across the u.k., purchased five wards in the city of birmingham.
that information is ever shared throughout the community or the white house or wherever, there has to be a compelling reason for national security, for why this information has to leave. if you collect on americans, foreign intelligence agencies, that information should be deep-sixed and thus there is a compelling reason. if there is a compelling reason, you can share it, but it has to be masked. what it appears happened here, these transcripts were shared and went all the way to the white house, raw intelligence. in my ten years on the committee, i never saw raw intelligence. i only saw intelligence analysis. that is a huge breach of confidence. why? who knows. it s interesting. martha: and the person who has her job now says that when he saw this brief flow of information, he said he only saw about a dozen but there s a lot more, that it alarmed him. he found it alarming that our intel agencies would be allowing
that democrats would lay down and say, you know what, we understand what republicans did over the course of the last year and denying merrick garland the opportunity to meet was wrong, but we are not going to say that two wrongs make a right. but in this current situation where you have donald trump in the white house, where it is all about wiretaps, collusion, all that, that that person should then immediately step in and be given the opportunity to nominate a supreme court justice, i think that is why you had even moderate democrats like even bob casey of pennsylvania saying they will filibuster. martha: i think the american people across the country look at that and they say, gee, if we ran our lives that way, we would be in pretty big trouble. if you have to overlook a person who is obviously qualified for the job, karl, and you re going to bring in every other dirty issue and pin it on this guy to make yourself feel better,