that information is ever shared throughout the community or the white house or wherever, there has to be a compelling reason for national security, for why this information has to leave. if you collect on americans, foreign intelligence agencies, that information should be deep-sixed and thus there is a compelling reason. if there is a compelling reason, you can share it, but it has to be masked. what it appears happened here, these transcripts were shared and went all the way to the white house, raw intelligence. in my ten years on the committee, i never saw raw intelligence. i only saw intelligence analysis. that is a huge breach of confidence. why? who knows. it s interesting. martha: and the person who has her job now says that when he saw this brief flow of information, he said he only saw about a dozen but there s a lot more, that it alarmed him. he found it alarming that our intel agencies would be allowing
that information is ever shared throughout the community or the white house or wherever, there has to be a compelling reason for national security, for why this information has to leave. if you collect on americans, foreign intelligence agencies, that information should be deep-sixed and thus there is a compelling reason. if there is a compelling reason, you can share it, but it has to be masked. what it appears happened here, these transcripts were shared and went all the way to the white house, raw intelligence. in my ten years on the committee, i never saw raw intelligence. i only saw intelligence analysis. that is a huge breach of confidence. why? who knows. it s interesting. martha: and the person who has her job now says that when he saw this brief flow of information, he said he only saw about a dozen but there s a lot more, that it alarmed him. he found it alarming that our