Of the nation in broad terms, and strong encryption is important to strong internet defense and will defend it is in our best interests. Within the broad framework of though the challenge we cant figure out is realizing that communication that the use by very law abiding citizens, nationstates and companies engage in lawful activity is also being used by criminals, terrorists, nationstates who attempted generate advanced against the United States advocates are allies and partners. So were trying to figure out how do we balance these two important. Is a privacy and security, and realizing the world around us is changing in a foundational way. So were trying to come to grips broadly with how do we do with the reality of the technical world around us to yet the broader legal and social imperatives we have begun the first acknowledge we do not have a defined way to hit you in the end i think this is about how to get the best minds together to address this. When i look at our capabilities a
Them as a partner. That describes the president s overall approach to congress right now. Hopefully, momentarily, we will have a continuing resolution. We have seen very positive signs with theminal Justice Senate to reform a system where we are spending 80 billion a year. We do not have to agree on everything to find common ground. That has been the president s approach. I think that is what he did as a senator and what yes done both domestically and internationally since he has been the president of the United States. Host thank you, valerie jarrett. Ms. Jarrett thank you. This was the scene outside the cathedral of Saint Matthew the apostle earlier today, when several Supreme Court justices attended the annual red mass, which marks the Supreme Courts new term. Here are a look at some of the justices departing the service and meeting with others who attended. , as the Supreme Court starts the new term, cspan debuts landmark cases. On the series premiere, we look ury versus madison. T
For giving us another day. While members come to the end of a long weekend of constituent visits, bless them and those with whom they consult, among those they represent, with wisdom, patience and generosity as they seek law and policy that benefits not only local interests but, where possible, the greater common good of our country. We again ask you to impel those who possess power here in the capitol to be mindful of those whom they represent, who possess little or no power. Finally, bless those men and a women who work faithfully here at the capitol from staffers to maintenance, to security, all who serve to enable the engines of legislation to proceed without distraction of day to day concerns. May all that is done today be for your greater honor and glory, amen. The speaker pro tempore the chair has examined the journal of the last days proceedings and announces to the house his approval thereof. Pursuant to clause 1 of rule 1 the journal stands approved. The chair will now lead t
That when you introduced a bill, you had to cite Constitutional Authority for legislation. That continues in the existing congress. Whenever a member introduces a bill, they are required to point to a section of the constitution that they think justifies that. Of course, every member gets to look at that. Also, before i became chairman, i suggested to our leadership that it would be good to read the constitution. We did that for the very first time in the beginning of the congress in 2011. We have done it twice more since then. Very strong bipartisan support. Dozens, over 100 members usually come down and read pieces of the constitution. I asked my staff when we started doing it to check and see when the last time the United States constitution was read on the floor of the house of representatives in its entirety by anybody. Not by a large group, just by anyone. It turns out that it was 1800 and never. It had never been read on the floor before. We are trying to promote interest in the
Country. Guest i agree. Look at thesting to different outcomes. The decisions were pro defendant. And, of the search and seizure berger and william rehnquist, they favor the libertyt the cost of , personal and individual. Host we have more cases and we produced a book that is available to you and outlines the cases. It is available on the website. Theng the next few months, this series will reair and you can watch this on television. This will archive on the website. Will hitilable and we it to you quickly. We have a few minutes left. We will take a few calls. Next is pete. Thank you for this. I enjoy this and try to catch it whenever. About the Fourth Amendment jurisprudence and the exclusionary rule being considered with a lot of exceptions. What do you think about the warrant preference Going Forward . There is that tension in the Fourth Amendment with a preference for the warrant and a ness requirement. Guest you see a orange reference construction warrant preference construction.