instruction that will go along with it that you are not to consider it to say in fact he committed this crime in this particular case. but, come on. only to say that this is a pattern of conduct that has been used. but you think about it, how you cannot have. prosecutor not convinced the judge is going to along with what you say. this is pre-trial. civil deposition. that 2005 deposition where he admits to giving quaaludes to this woman, i get that excluded. how? a, it s civil and, b, you could only admit that evidence if the person who is saying it is not available in the courtroom. cosby is sitting right there. he is available. you can t bring that up. do you disagree with that? respectfully i m going to tell you that you can also say that it is a statement against interest when made at the time that the person would be suffering civil, criminal or peculiar area
chaos. there is a specific jury instruction that will go along with it that you are not to consider it to say in fact he committed this crime in this particular case. but, come on. only to say that this is a pattern of conduct that has been used. but you think about it, how you cannot have. prosecutor not convinced the judge is going to along with what you say. this is pre-trial. civil deposition. that 2005 deposition where he admits to giving quaaludes to this woman, i get that excluded. how? a, it s civil and, b, you could only admit that evidence if the person who is saying it is not available in the courtroom. cosby is sitting right there. he is available. you can t bring that up. do you disagree with that? respectfully i m going to tell you that you can also say that it is a statement against interest when made at the time that the person would be suffering civil, criminal or peculiar area
be used, borrowed, in the criminal case? depends, on what exactly she might have to say. keep in mind, according to all of the evidence, including in the police complaint that we read just this past week the only two people in the room were bill cosby and the victim. talking about the criminal case in pennsylvania. andrea constand. correct, if she, being camille knows anything, it would only be hearsay because of something that her husband presumably told her. if that would be considered something to be a confidential marital communication, she may have a privilege to keep off the stand, in other words, not have to testify about that, in a criminal trial. okay. so, we are at this juncture with the criminal case because that s what was once a sealed deposition of bill cosby was unsealed, and because there was that admission of inappropriate behavior and use of quaaludes,
victims v of rape in california. federal judge edward moreno called him a public moralizer. it was one of the reasons he decided to unseal the deposition which then of course we see mr.s would r cosby under oath testifying about giving quaaludes to a woman. having said that, i just want to say that all women that are coming forward are not necessarily the ones who were involved with quaaludes. my client, judy huth, who was only 25 years old, claims she was victimized by mr. cosby at the playboy mansion. we re litigating that. it may not be that only andrea constand has her day in court. the other piece of that 57 women piece is just if you are early on in that, there is this kind of guilt that also exists, even though because carrying
deposition either make it much more difficult for his defense team or can it even be further complicated for the prosecution? it makes it, i think, much harder for the defense team, fredricka, because he basically admitted that not with respect to miss constand but with others that he gave them quaaludes. now, it s in dispute what exactly he gave miss constand. it not in dispute he gave her pills. he says it was benadryl. his mother says he told her it was something out of a prescription bottle, he d have to read the label and get back to her. he admitted to giving her pills and admits to the police, the benadryl puts him to sleep right away. his own words, why he ever sat down and agreed to talk to the police in the first place, i cannot figure out. because they thought it would be sealed? i m talking about the police interview. he went with lawyers and talked to the police and he confirmed everything and gave them the